On 3/11/07, Christophe Henner christophe.henner@gmail.com wrote:
As you can read on the very first lign of this section meta. is enough for translations :)
You are the one talking about a "translation wiki".
What I'm speaking about is wider. Actually we have big communities,
but what about a core Community. Are we enough volounteer? No we're not. Is it easy for volounteers to get involved? Not at all. What I'm speaking about is linking the communities.
This part is the long term part of the meeting. It's not something to do tommorrow but something we have to begin to set up.
This part was "start reflexion", and I will continue to push it forward with the recruitment of the volounteer coordinator. We need more internal communication, and meta. is not right for this, it will be easier to have a main community wiki and then guide them where they can help.
Could you just explain *once* *why* meta is not "right for this"? Meta is our central coordination wiki. Linking the communities is one of its goals. If meta fails in that, improve it, it is a wiki.