Hi Haytham, Just to be clear, I was not proposing disabling *translation* of those pages. I just propose removing them as aggregate groups, because they're historical pages (and need to be discouraged for translation anyway, a different task on another slow/massive page). Is there anything specific about the AggregateGroups feature that you find useful, in relation to these historical pages? Hi Philippe, Yup, that's the ideal solution (and tracked in https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T90511 ), but in the meantime, I was just wondering if there was any benefit to anyone, in leaving these historic pages as AggregateGroups, or, if it would just be happy cleanup work for me to remove them. :-) Thanks both. On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 2:21 PM, Haytham Aly <haytham.hammam(a)gmail.com> wrote: -- Nick Wilson (Quiddity) Community Liaison, WMF _______________________________________________ Translators-l mailing list Translators-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/translators-l

I think the whole separate concept of "tranlation aggregate groups" is absolutely not needed (and was ill-designed since first time, without thinking about any form of scalability), this feature could just use the existing categories: just mark existing category pages as translatable, and it will create implicitly an aggregate group. Then translated pages in that category are automatically sorted within translated categories. Note that categy pages ARE translatable too (see many examples in Meta or Commons or many other multilingual wikis outside Wikimedia). No more "special page" for this feature. Special pages are just needed for marking pages for translations, and translated categories will be automatically created as well (their description may still use translation units), using language fallbacks by default for mising translated category names and category descriptions marked with <translate></translate> tags and submitted to the translation tool (by existing users with "translation admin" privilege). No special navigation needed, and we can use the standard search tools for articles and categories. An addon on translated categories could provide aggregate statistics, just like we have singular statistics displayed at top of translated pages, and the "Translate" tab replacing the "Edit" tab on pages or categories already marked for translations. We also can use the existing "category tree" extension, or just continue browsing categories with groups of 200 items, and with sort keys like we have today. Like today with aggregate groups, aggregate statistics will still require some low-priority background job to refresh them regularly (singular statistics for one page only will be made first nearly synchronously) except that they will use translated pages collected in categories, to compute completion levels per page, and then for all pages listed in a given category and other stats combining pages in all its subcategories and descendants (taking care of avoiding double counts). Ideally Work should be done to allow easier marking of pages for translations (with the VisualEditor), but this is a separate task. If this was completed, and the translation memory was smarter to detect translation units that are split, we could get rid of the "transaltion admin" privilege. The translation parser should also be able to split automatically lists of items (ordered numbered lists, unordered ulleted lists, definition lists) and automatically split tables by cell/header/caption. The "<translate>" markers should become invisible in the VisualEditor (replaced by hover events showing where translation units have been delimited such as showing a border and an icon in the border that allows enabling/disabling a translation unit, or split it by sentence. The VisualEditor should also be able to detect too long translation units (long paragraphs with multiple sentences) and suggest places to split them. With such behavior, anyone could work on source pages. The task for translation admins would just be to check the number of fuzzy units or the deletion or complete replacement or of units by new ones. Paragraphs could be restructured, moved/split more easily without breaking existing translation units. But they would no longer need to have to manage aggregate groups with specific tools. 2017-04-14 0:42 GMT+02:00 Nick Wilson (Quiddity) &lt;nwilson(a)wikimedia.org&gt;rg>: _______________________________________________ Translators-l mailing list Translators-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/translators-l