On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 8:44 PM, Purodha Blissenbach
<purodha(a)blissenbach.org> wrote:
Hi. I was unclear.
... it was reverted [ because it did not work ] ... and deployed again [
thus we have the problem back since ]
This is not the intended message, is it?
No, I assumed it would be implied that we had fixed it before
redeploying. One shouldn't assume things like that, I suppose. :) I've
made that explicit as well as tried to address a couple of the other
questions and requests. Sorry for not being clear enough. Existing
translations don't need to be updated.
//Johan Jönsson
--