>Jesli mozna skladac zmowienia, to co powiedzialbys na opracowanie
tematu
>Jimmy Hendrix? Wlasnie po raz kolejny puszczam sobie kolekcje jego
nagran.
>:-))))
>Beno/GEMMA
Hendrix jest w planach nadchodzącego tygodnia. Wcześniej jednak The
Doors i Jim Morrison.
Jonasz
Jesli mozna skladac zmowienia, to co powiedzialbys na opracowanie tematu
Jimmy Hendrix? Wlasnie po raz kolejny puszczam sobie kolekcje jego nagran.
:-))))
Beno/GEMMA
Właśnie przystąpiłem do pisania artykułu Historia Kanady. Już teraz
widzę, że będzie to artykuł dość spory. W związku z tym pytanie.
Pytanie, które będzie dotyczyło historii krajów w ogóle.
Czy pisać jeden długi artykuł czy raczej drobić go. Jeśli to drugie to
jaką konwencje nazewnictwa przyjąć np:
Historia Kanady - Acadia
Historia Acadii
Czy może jeszcze inaczej.
Jonasz
Czy nie lepiej byłoby, gdyby data na głównej stronie wikipedii nie była
generowana przez serwer, tylko przez javascript ?
W ten sposób nawet osoby z cache-m dostawałyby aktualną datę, a nie
przestarzałą jak w tej chwili.
Olaf
Cross posted to Wikilegal-l(a)wikipedia.org and WikiPL-l(a)wikipedia.org
From: "Alex R." <alex756(a)nyc.rr.com>
To: <wikipedia-l(a)wikipedia.org>; <wikien-l(a)wikipedia.org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 1:05 PM
Subject: Fw: [Wikipedia-l] Re: AstroWikipedia
> It appears the below post did not get through
> at the time it was posted or maybe it was
> posted to the wrong mailing list
> (another reason it might be a good idea
> to have Wikipedia-legal-l(a)wikipedia.org
> as a legal issue specific list).
>
> I might have thought it was more a general
> Wikipedia question than a Wikien-l question
> and posted it there.
>
> I also generally agree with
> Imran's statement of the most recent post
> on the English Wikipedia list concerning
> this topic (reproduced below) but would
> like more information before deciding how
> to present it to them. It appears that their
> claim to the name is weak and pl.wikipedia.org
> has already made inroads in Polish speaking
> communities for use of the name as a
> distinguishing "mark" associated it
> with other Wikimedia projects. Knowing
> when they started using the name (hopefully
> after the date that the Polish Wikipedia was
> started) will help to convince them that they
> have little or no claim to the name.
>
> Alex756
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Alex R." <alex756(a)nyc.rr.com>
> To: <wikipedia-l(a)Wikipedia.org>; "Daniel Ehrenberg"
> <littledanehren(a)yahoo.com>
> Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2003 8:43 PM
> Subject: Re: [Wikipedia-l] Re: AstroWikipedia
>
>
> > From: "Jimmy Wales" <jwales(a)bomis.com>
> >
> > > This is probably something that Alex can comment on helpfully.
> > >
> > > We probably do need to setup a wiki-legal. In any event, althugh
> > > Daniel posted this on wikien-l, I'm moving it to Wikipedia-l.
> > >
> > > Daniel Ehrenberg wrote:
> > >
> > > > I just found AstroWikipedia, a small polish-language
> > > > wiki of astrology using PhpWiki at astrowikipedia.com.
> > > > It seems that they created the name independently of
> > > > us. Should we do anything? It would be bad to force
> > > > them to change their name, but should we at least get
> > > > them to say they're not connected with Wikipedia?
> > > > LDan
> >
> > Would be good to get some more information. Did they
> > come up with the name independently? I don't know much
> > Polish, but they appear to be a new site. If they didn't know
> > about Wikipedia (or the Polish Wikipedia) perhaps someone
> > from pl.wikipedia.org should try and contact them and
> > find out more information before deciding what to do. The
> > information: Why did they chose that name? Do they know
> > there is a Polish language Wikipedia? When did they
> > start using the name?
> >
> > Once we know the answers to those questions perhaps
> > we can make an informed decision about what to do.
> >
> > Alex756
> >
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jimmy Wales" <jwales(a)bomis.com>
> To: "English Wikipedia" <wikien-l(a)Wikipedia.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 10:23 AM
> Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] AstroWikipedia
>
>
> > I'll defer to Alex's judgement on this, but yes, that's my thinking
> > as well.
> >
> > Imran Ghory wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, 12 Oct 2003, cprompt wrote:
> > >
> > > > Don't see any reason to. They're not claiming to be connected to
> > > > Wikipedia, and Wikipedia, Wiktionary, and all our other sites all
list
> > > > which sites are ours.
> > >
> > > IANAL. But, my understand is that general use of the term Wikipedia
> could
> > > generify it, thus preventing the Wikimedia foundation from gaining a
> > > trademark on the name at a later date.
> > >
> > > I think we should either move to stop them using the term, or take
other
> > > actions that would prevent the name being generified.
> > >
> > > Imran
> > > --