Hello,
I'm running Mediawiki 1.9 with the SSO plugin. Default user can't edit
pages, only the one in the group "WikiEditor" can do it. Is there a way
to list all users who are the "WikiEditor" as group (except a SELECT in
the database ? :-P)
Thanks by advance,
Johan
"Les informations contenues dans ce message electronique peuvent etre de nature confidentielles et soumises a une obligation de secret. Elles sont destinees a l'usage exclusif du reel destinataire. Si vous n'etes pas le reel destinataire, ou si vous recevez ce message par erreur, merci de le detruire immediatement et de le notifier a son emetteur."
"The information contained in this e-mail may be privileged and confidential. It is intended for the exclusive use of the designated recipients named above. If you are not the intended recipient or if you receive this e-mail in error, please delete it and immediately notify the sender."
Daunting
Fred
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jack D. Pond [mailto:jack.pond@psitex.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, April 4, 2007 09:08 PM
>To: ''MediaWiki announcements and site admin list''
>Subject: [Mediawiki-l] MediaWiki Enhancement for Discussion Threading
>
>Many of my developers and project managers like threading for discussions.
>In order to get greater adoption, I've developed an extension/patch that
>makes the discussion page look like the archives of a listserv. Don't know
>if this is even worth consideration, but in the spirit of openness thought I
>would throw it out. If there's time and interest, I'll clean it up and make
>it generally available - right now it's very experimental - although we're
>using it here in production.
>
>I've posted this highly experimental patch/extension at
>http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:DiscussionThreading
><http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:DiscussionThreading>
>
>This extension implements a discussion threading process. This threading
>will only be seen on the talk pages, unless explicitly invoked in the
>command line.
>
>It adds a [reply] link on the header line. Each time a new posting is
>entered or a posting is replied to, the comment will automatically be tagged
>(and appear in the TOC too). Of course direct editing can occur, but this
>really makes it a lot easier to organize discussions in a threading view
>that most are familiar with.
>
>
>
>To do (if there's enough interest):
>
>1. Internationalize
>2. get someone who knows regex to clean up the parsing of the subject
>line
>3. Assess to see if there's an easier way to do this - I've probably
>screwed it up royally.
>
>
>
>Montgomery County Shield <http://www.montcopa.org/> Jack D. Pond
>CIO, Montgomery County, PA
>
>"Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and
>conscientious stupidity." -- Martin Luther King, Jr. (1929-1968)
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>MediaWiki-l mailing list
>MediaWiki-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
>
Hi,
Using newest Version of Mediawiki, and the time is 2 hours to early - so I
tried to set in LocalSettings.php:
$wgLocaltimezone = "Europe/Zurich";
and I tried also set this to "CET";
Both settings crashing my apache webserver :-\
Any ideas?
I finally got a test environment set up so I can try out different
methods for access control.
The first one I wanted to try was suggested by Platonides.
I took a look at the diffs at
http://svn.wikimedia.org/viewvc/mediawiki?view=rev&revision=19110 and
applied them manually to included/Title.php and
includes/DefaultSettings.php.
This is as far as I got.
I guess since it isn't included in the default download of MediaWiki
there isn't much talk about using it out there.
Could someone explain to me how I would use this to restrict editing of
pages in "namespace x" to users in "group y"?
Thanks,
~Eric
Relevant quotes from a previous thread "access controls in 1.9.3" below
Platonides wrote:
>Frederik Dohr wrote:
>>> If you only want to restrict by namespace, it's much easier. You
could
>>> code an an extension for it or even use the builtin
>>> $wgNamespaceProtection (including everything but Talk namespace).
>>
>> Hmm, the manual page* says $wgNamespaceProtection was introduced in
v1.10, which has not been released yet... !?
>> Sounds interesting though!
>
>It's on SVN. You can download a full install from there
>http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Download_from_SVN
>
>You can also patch your current version. $wgNamespaceProtection was
>included in r19110
>http://svn.wikimedia.org/viewvc/mediawiki?view=rev&revision=19110
>
>Another posible solution would be using the Talkright extension
>http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talkright_extension
Platonides wrote:
>Frederich, Eric P21322 wrote:
>> Does using $wgNamespaceProtection give me the option to restrict
editing
>> anything in a namespace (except the talk pages) to a particular
group?
>> I'm guessing I can create a custom group of people and don't have to
use
>> the default sysop / bureaucrat stuff.
>
>Yes, it requires the user to have a permission (which you can give to a
>custom
>group). Talk pages are not affected, as Talk_X is a different namespace
>than X
Many of my developers and project managers like threading for discussions.
In order to get greater adoption, I've developed an extension/patch that
makes the discussion page look like the archives of a listserv. Don't know
if this is even worth consideration, but in the spirit of openness thought I
would throw it out. If there's time and interest, I'll clean it up and make
it generally available - right now it's very experimental - although we're
using it here in production.
I've posted this highly experimental patch/extension at
http://www.mediawiki.org/Wiki/Extension:DiscussionThreading
<http://www.mediawiki.org/Wiki/Extension:DiscussionThreading>
This extension implements a discussion threading process. This threading
will only be seen on the talk pages, unless explicitly invoked in the
command line.
It adds a [reply] link on the header line. Each time a new posting is
entered or a posting is replied to, the comment will automatically be tagged
(and appear in the TOC too). Of course direct editing can occur, but this
really makes it a lot easier to organize discussions in a threading view
that most are familiar with.
To do (if there's enough interest):
1. Internationalize
2. get someone who knows regex to clean up the parsing of the subject
line
3. Assess to see if there's an easier way to do this - I've probably
screwed it up royally.
Montgomery County Shield <http://www.montcopa.org/> Jack D. Pond
CIO, Montgomery County, PA
"Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and
conscientious stupidity." -- Martin Luther King, Jr. (1929-1968)
Maya Narayanan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Yes, the images don't give much info. I have attached the localsettings.php
> and main.css to which we made changes. The skin is monobook. Page source is
> also provided. There is a tag -
>
> <body <div id='space'> </div>
> class="ns-0 ltr">
>
> could this be the culprit? :-)
This tag is certainly wrong. It shouldn't be there.
The problem is in your main.css I have tried it and it broke my install
in the same way. As well as moving the elements around. I now have the
page title over the action tabs, so i guess it might have to do with the
z-order and positioning.
Try using an original main.css It will probably fix. Then you can readd
the changes little by little until you find where the problem is.
The posted url does not work
Fred
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jack D. Pond [mailto:jack.pond@psitex.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, April 4, 2007 09:08 PM
>To: ''MediaWiki announcements and site admin list''
>Subject: [Mediawiki-l] MediaWiki Enhancement for Discussion Threading
>
>Many of my developers and project managers like threading for discussions.
>In order to get greater adoption, I've developed an extension/patch that
>makes the discussion page look like the archives of a listserv. Don't know
>if this is even worth consideration, but in the spirit of openness thought I
>would throw it out. If there's time and interest, I'll clean it up and make
>it generally available - right now it's very experimental - although we're
>using it here in production.
>
>I've posted this highly experimental patch/extension at
>http://www.mediawiki.org/Wiki/Extension:DiscussionThreading
><http://www.mediawiki.org/Wiki/Extension:DiscussionThreading>
>
>This extension implements a discussion threading process. This threading
>will only be seen on the talk pages, unless explicitly invoked in the
>command line.
>
>It adds a [reply] link on the header line. Each time a new posting is
>entered or a posting is replied to, the comment will automatically be tagged
>(and appear in the TOC too). Of course direct editing can occur, but this
>really makes it a lot easier to organize discussions in a threading view
>that most are familiar with.
>
>
>
>To do (if there's enough interest):
>
>1. Internationalize
>2. get someone who knows regex to clean up the parsing of the subject
>line
>3. Assess to see if there's an easier way to do this - I've probably
>screwed it up royally.
>
>
>
>Montgomery County Shield <http://www.montcopa.org/> Jack D. Pond
>CIO, Montgomery County, PA
>
>"Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and
>conscientious stupidity." -- Martin Luther King, Jr. (1929-1968)
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>MediaWiki-l mailing list
>MediaWiki-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
>
Hi,
in my mediawiki installation the generated rss and atom feeds are
invalid in cause of two empty lines before '<?xml version=...'.
Does anybody know how to resolve this problem?
Mediawiki is running at a windows xp box with php 5.2, mysql and apache.
Thanks
alx
Hi,
some of you might already know it from IRC or the news. The
Bibliographisches Institut & F.A. Brockhaus AG, publishing some of the
best-known general purpose encyclopedias in the German language has
started a web site last year that contains the full text of the
"Meyers Taschenlexikon", a paperback small-to-medium size reference
work mostly aimed at students. lexikon.meyers.de is the url. In the
first weeks of its existence, they "forgot" to mention that this site
is running MediaWiki (stripped of any Wiki functions).
In fall 2006, I met the CEO of the electronic/online department of
Brockhaus during the book fair in Frankfurt on a discussion panel. He
promised to release all the modifications they did to MediaWiki under
the GPL. A few weeks ago, they set up an SVN server where they had
published those modifications
http://lexikon.meyers.de/meyers/Meyers-SVN
The description says GPL 2.0.
(didn't I mention this earlier on somewhere else? Sorry, if this is a dupe)
Mathias