David,
We definitely should nominate 10 photos for the international finals. I would
suggest the 3 National winners, the 3 Western Cape winners and 4 more.
Criteria for quality images are very strict. Possibly one or two of the
competition photos will pass that selection, but I doubt overall the image
quality was not all that good. I would however suggest that we submit some for
Values Images and Featured Pictures. They still need to be technically good
photos, but quality criteria is lower as these focus more of the image subject
and content.
There was definitely a couple of WOW photos entered during the competition that
will be perfect for Featured Pictures.
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Valued_images
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:FPC
Nick
On Friday, 16 November 2012 06:02:09 David Richfield wrote:
Hi all,
I've added our winning pictures at
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wiki_Loves_Monuments_2012_winners#South_Af
rica .
I don't have time to complete the job, though:
1) Do we have a list of finalists?
2) Check out
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Winners_of_Wiki_Loves_Monuments_
2012_in_Germany - what categories should we create? One for winers, one for
runners-up?
3) We should probably nominate them as "quality images" (like "good
article, but for pictures").
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Quality_images
--
David Richfield
[[:en:User:Slashme]]
+27718539985
_______________________________________________
WikimediaZA mailing list
WikimediaZA(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaza