This really upsets me. But if the content is in Urdu, then (a) we ask what's going on, (b) we don't approve, and (c) in all likelihood, we propose an indef block on Incubator, given that many of the same characters were involved in a problem around the Khowar project a couple of years back. Steven Sent from Outlook <http://aka.ms/weboutlook> ------------------------------ *From:* Langcom &lt;langcom-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org&gt; on behalf of Jon Harald Søby &lt;jhsoby(a)gmail.com&gt; *Sent:* Monday, October 7, 2019 5:33 AM *To:* Wikimedia Foundation Language Committee &lt;langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org *Subject:* [Langcom] Wikipedia in Saraiki Hi all! I wanted to let you know that I'm in touch with an expert with regards to verifying Wikipedia in Saraiki <https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fincubator.wikimedia.org%2Fwiki%2FWp%2Fskr&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cdc60e7578e584deb515d08d74b0986c2%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637060376596195282&sdata=SoLBKQzmES5TiqNIBMct9ibZ6JZQTUW2JmHRF5aXejo%3D&reserved=0> (skr). It was previously mentioned by Seven in an email titled "Final approval for four projects" from August 16. The expert checked one page and said it is in Urdu and not Saraiki (although it is *about* Saraiki topics). He said he will get back to me to check more pages in a week or two. However, after he said that, I've checked several pages with Google Translate from Urdu to English, and they all produce very legible content (for Google Translate). That makes me suspicious that maybe all the content is in fact in Urdu – if it was in fact in a smaller language, I would expect a certain amount of words that Google Translate just doesn't understand. So the question is, what do we do if it turns out that most/all content is in Urdu? -- mvh Jon Harald Søby _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom

Hoi, The final stage is that we verify if the language it is said to be. When we find it is not or are not certain we have all the room to seek another authority to move forward. At this stage it becomes confusing and I am not convinced at all that we should. Thanks, GerardM On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 at 19:21, Steven White &lt;koala19890(a)hotmail.com&gt; wrote: _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom

Have we heard from the expert yet? On a related subject: Do we have any Wiktionary experts here? Saraiki Wiktionary is also now approvable in theory (assuming that the language issue on the Wikipedia clears). My concern about the Saraiki Wiktionary is only that compared to a lot of Wiktionary projects, this one appears pretty basic to me: just a straight Saraiki dictionary, with little in the way of bells and whistles (pronunciation, translations to other languages, etc.). But that's just based on the gross appearance of pages, as I do not read Saraiki (or any other language written in Perso-Arabic script). So Satdeep and anyone else: Does the content look ok? Are there greater expectations of what a Wiktionary should contain—expectations we have not communicated, I will add—or is this project appropriate and acceptable? Steven Sent from Outlook <http://aka.ms/weboutlook> ------------------------------ *From:* Langcom &lt;langcom-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org&gt; on behalf of Jon Harald Søby &lt;jhsoby(a)gmail.com&gt; *Sent:* Thursday, October 10, 2019 3:38 PM *To:* Wikimedia Foundation Language Committee &lt;langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org *Subject:* Re: [Langcom] Wikipedia in Saraiki I am still waiting to hear back from the expert. If he says the rest of the pages look fine, then I think we can move forward – Steven makes some good points as usual. tor. 10. okt. 2019 kl. 21:03 skrev Gerard Meijssen < gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com&gt;gt;: Hoi, The final stage is that we verify if the language it is said to be. When we find it is not or are not certain we have all the room to seek another authority to move forward. At this stage it becomes confusing and I am not convinced at all that we should. Thanks, GerardM On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 at 19:21, Steven White &lt;koala19890(a)hotmail.com&gt; wrote: This is effectively the same problem as we saw in the discussion of Montenegrin Wikipedia—although since all but two of us are from Europe, North America or Israel, we feel more confident making calls in a case like Montenegrin than we do here. (And, candidly, there is less chance in the Montenegrin case of being accused of racism/Euro-centrism, even if that accusation would be totally without merit in this case.) But as I said back then, the rule as currently written is fine when the language area starts with a clean slate. If there were no Western Punjabi Wikipedia now, we could reasonably try to get a single project to try to accommodate both Western Punjabi and Saraiki. (Whether that effort would be successful is a different question, but we could try.) However, I take Satdeep's comment below to indicate that there would be serious problems trying to integrate a new Saraiki-language community into a ten-year old Western Punjabi-language community, and that he recommends against it, based on the current "facts on the ground". Besides, to some extent the time to say "no" has passed, since Satdeep marked the project as "eligible" in 2017. So I think we need to move forward with this. Steven Sent from Outlook <https://eur04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Faka.ms%2Fweboutlook&data=02%7C01%7C%7C27b14763c84b4b786fe808d74db9839a%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637063331479640783&sdata=%2Be5t%2F8MN7boQ1F1ZLIYwwDG0L5Y2w685G48TmpiTLN8%3D&reserved=0> ------------------------------ *From:* Langcom &lt;langcom-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org&gt; on behalf of Jon Harald Søby &lt;jhsoby(a)gmail.com&gt; *Sent:* Wednesday, October 9, 2019 4:44 AM *To:* Wikimedia Foundation Language Committee &lt;langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org *Subject:* Re: [Langcom] Wikipedia in Saraiki ... As for the Western Punjabi/Saraiki issue, I don't know enough about that to have any opinion either way. tir. 8. okt. 2019 kl. 19:00 skrev Satdeep Gill &lt;satdeepgill(a)gmail.com&gt;om>: ... P.S. Western Punjabi and Saraiki are pretty similar and my personal view is that this should be accommodated on one Wikipedia but the sociology-political situation in Pakistan calls for a separate Wikipedia for Saraiki. Regards Satdeep Gill _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom <https://eur04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.wikimedia.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Flangcom&data=02%7C01%7C%7C27b14763c84b4b786fe808d74db9839a%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637063331479640783&sdata=vRDOwHRLv%2B6qFNok%2BLJNeiRAFrzuBWGo6pRn1BO1%2B9g%3D&reserved=0> _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom <https://eur04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.wikimedia.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Flangcom&data=02%7C01%7C%7C27b14763c84b4b786fe808d74db9839a%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637063331479650791&sdata=XOi5ymt%2Fz8fi71Oltu04freVjNcHF97HV0YlMZsR4p4%3D&reserved=0> -- mvh Jon Harald Søby _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom

While there may be a close similarity to Western Punjabi, I agree with

:

While there may be a close similarity to Western Punjabi, I agree with

:

:

:

:

It's not clear at all. Depends upon who you ask. It's a typical language-dialect problem. I do know that, the Saraiki community in Pakistan has also been demanding a separate Saraikistan. So, for the community it's pretty much a separate language. If you are asking my opinion then even Punjabi and Western Punjabi Wikipedias should have been one Wikipedia with two scripts (maybe a third script as well). Even Hindi-Urdu for that matter. It's always the socio-political reasons. As per Wikipedia: *Saraiki was considered a dialect of Punjabi <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punjabi_dialects> by most British colonial <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Raj> administrators,[29] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saraiki_language#cite_note-FOOTNOTERahman1996173-32> and is still seen as such by many Punjabis <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punjabis>.[30] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saraiki_language#cite_note-FOOTNOTEShackle2014a-33> Saraikis, however, consider it a language in its own right[31] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saraiki_language#cite_note-34> and see the use of the term "dialect" as stigmatising <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_stigma>.[32] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saraiki_language#cite_note-FOOTNOTERahman1996175-35> A language movement was started in the 1960s to standardise a script and promote the language.[20] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saraiki_language#cite_note-FOOTNOTEShackle1977-22>[33] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saraiki_language#cite_note-FOOTNOTERahman1997838-36> * Best Satdeep On Mon, 21 Oct, 2019, 9:20 AM MF-Warburg, &lt;mfwarburg(a)googlemail.com&gt; wrote: _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom

Well, as I have said many times, the current rule as written is problematic, and we have no business rejecting Montenegrin at this point. Please understand, again, that I don't object to the rule in principle. If we were starting today with a situation where there were no Serbo-Croatian projects existing (or no Punjabi projects existing), we might well try to say, "You know what? There's only going to be one, and you're all going to have to get along, and this needs to be irrespective of political perspective." But at this point, it doesn't work in either situation, for several reasons: 1. There are long-existing communities already. They each already have a culture, rules, and perspectives. 2. Based on a different, very firm WMF policy, "central authority" is almost never allowed to intervene on individual projects to "force" them to be more accommodating to the political and/or cultural minorities that could choose to participate. 3. The policy, as written, says *"The committee does not consider political differences, since the Wikimedia Foundation's goal is to give every single person free, unbiased access to the sum of all human knowledge, rather than information from the viewpoint of individual political communities."* You have to read the whole sentence there, not just the first phrase. By "not consider[ing]" political differences, the committee in fact perpetuates the fact that *existing* projects may already have "the viewpoint of individual political communities". In these cases, people in minority communities are tremendously disadvantaged in that they have to overcome (possibly) hostile political/cultural viewpoints—and may well not be able to do so. It seems to me that there is only one way to operate this rule exactly as it is already written: "Central authority" must have the power to intervene on certain projects, and to establish and enforce rules that guarantee the neutrality that every project is supposed to have anyway. If that's not going to happen—and I'm pretty sure it's not, for a whole lot of reasons—then we need to allow new projects where (a) there is a language code, and (b) there are going to be significant political and cultural barriers in integrating minority communities into existing projects. Steven Sent from Outlook <http://aka.ms/weboutlook> ------------------------------ *From:* Langcom &lt;langcom-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org&gt; on behalf of MF-Warburg &lt;mfwarburg(a)googlemail.com&gt; *Sent:* Sunday, October 27, 2019 11:05 AM *To:* Wikimedia Foundation Language Committee &lt;langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org *Subject:* Re: [Langcom] Wikipedia in Saraiki Thanks for the info. So, what can we do? If we boldly reject requests for new Serbo-Croatian language/dialect Wikipedias and say the existing ones wouldn't be allowed today, isn't this case the same? Satdeep Gill &lt;satdeepgill(a)gmail.com&gt; schrieb am Mo., 21. Okt. 2019, 16:12: It's not clear at all. Depends upon who you ask. It's a typical language-dialect problem. I do know that, the Saraiki community in Pakistan has also been demanding a separate Saraikistan. So, for the community it's pretty much a separate language. If you are asking my opinion then even Punjabi and Western Punjabi Wikipedias should have been one Wikipedia with two scripts (maybe a third script as well). Even Hindi-Urdu for that matter. It's always the socio-political reasons. As per Wikipedia: *Saraiki was considered a dialect of Punjabi <https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FPunjabi_dialects&data=02%7C01%7C%7C068e7dc2150941c9230e08d75aef1ee4%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637077855372208727&sdata=bNKrEABp7UtyVVq6suOmBTaBWCv6foUQYvyOA%2FFg24c%3D&reserved=0> by most British colonial <https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FBritish_Raj&data=02%7C01%7C%7C068e7dc2150941c9230e08d75aef1ee4%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637077855372218732&sdata=c66RdPKBtrF3Emn%2F6CYl5S7pcqoAuStFpPG7XB6VmAU%3D&reserved=0> administrators,[29] <https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FSaraiki_language%23cite_note-FOOTNOTERahman1996173-32&data=02%7C01%7C%7C068e7dc2150941c9230e08d75aef1ee4%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637077855372218732&sdata=aA5novZh957MHcmbqPXkeTwbykdW5HLKif0N9XVT6nw%3D&reserved=0> and is still seen as such by many Punjabis <https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FPunjabis&data=02%7C01%7C%7C068e7dc2150941c9230e08d75aef1ee4%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637077855372228737&sdata=kFQxmWqwm0qnQAjJbtH6V2cCCXCzeu3PrYK49MUbst4%3D&reserved=0>.[30] <https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FSaraiki_language%23cite_note-FOOTNOTEShackle2014a-33&data=02%7C01%7C%7C068e7dc2150941c9230e08d75aef1ee4%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637077855372228737&sdata=NuAn6n0SWGtSzgFX1tim%2FcEGQfAkQiy2FAUb7Zf2aPY%3D&reserved=0> Saraikis, however, consider it a language in its own right[31] <https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FSaraiki_language%23cite_note-34&data=02%7C01%7C%7C068e7dc2150941c9230e08d75aef1ee4%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637077855372238746&sdata=C2mw5YlDLd7zCh%2BaNPXMqNDIX1MhL9%2BMkyjDLNvI1Eo%3D&reserved=0> and see the use of the term "dialect" as stigmatising <https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FSocial_stigma&data=02%7C01%7C%7C068e7dc2150941c9230e08d75aef1ee4%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637077855372238746&sdata=3QIHc8AuksXwi8sN0Abv1gGZmA1WiIXmVvBGVLPonfU%3D&reserved=0>.[32] <https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FSaraiki_language%23cite_note-FOOTNOTERahman1996175-35&data=02%7C01%7C%7C068e7dc2150941c9230e08d75aef1ee4%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637077855372248756&sdata=maRBbWYHsAF1TM7skiFG%2BXV2ZkE6KvydnYqVrp1VFfU%3D&reserved=0> A language movement was started in the 1960s to standardise a script and promote the language.[20] <https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FSaraiki_language%23cite_note-FOOTNOTEShackle1977-22&data=02%7C01%7C%7C068e7dc2150941c9230e08d75aef1ee4%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637077855372248756&sdata=0qmkxF9J8wJonpGAYSFUBnQ%2BbYVH8Q9%2B0Dr%2BFCoyf5o%3D&reserved=0>[33] <https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FSaraiki_language%23cite_note-FOOTNOTERahman1997838-36&data=02%7C01%7C%7C068e7dc2150941c9230e08d75aef1ee4%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637077855372258761&sdata=BuXlT8suNibyi%2F0sHh39DzCH6IBqEISRgiZxRCuM6IA%3D&reserved=0> * Best Satdeep On Mon, 21 Oct, 2019, 9:20 AM MF-Warburg, &lt;mfwarburg(a)googlemail.com&gt; wrote: Steven's point that the right time to bring that issue up would have been when we decided whether to mark the language as eligible. We *did* mark it as eligible (by Satdeep just over 2 years ago), and that has to mean something. To walk back on that now, after volunteers have spent hundreds and hundreds of hours working on it, is just not ok. I disagree with this notion. One of the tasks of the Language Committee is precisely to prevent new "Serbo-Croation" cases from happening. It has been suggested that this might be such a case here. So let us please discuss this issue and clear it up. I have done some reading and it seems to me that there might be enough differences between Saraiki and Western Punjabi anyway. But Satdeep brought up that that might not be the case, and on the request page there are also people who says that it's not a separate language (while others, of course, say the opposite). I just would like this to be clarified in order not to have a situation in several years where everyone acknowledges that it is most unfortunate that there are several wikis... (It is also a matter of fact that languages get marked as eligible all the time without a discussion, just because the majority of cases don't turn out to be problematic at all. I looked at the archives and saw that back then, Satdeep said on this list "There is some controversy regarding this but according to my analysis, it should be eligible." - That does not directly contradict his statement "Western Punjabi and Saraiki are pretty similar and my personal view is that this should be accommodated on one Wikipedia but the sociology-political situation in Pakistan calls for a separate Wikipedia for Saraiki." from 8 October, but I still would *love *to have the whole thing clarified as requested on 16 Oct. Back in 2017, Oliver Stegen said in reply to the mentioned mail: "Any controversies may come to ight and be discussed accordingly during the verification phase which has started now." and I agree with this; a random marking as eligible should not prevent a discussion about what the situation really is.) [Mails from 29 + 30 August 2017] Am So., 20. Okt. 2019 um 05:30 Uhr schrieb Jon Harald Søby < jhsoby(a)gmail.com&gt;gt;: I finally heard back from the first person [1] I emailed now, and he basically echoed what Satdeep said: All pages he checked, except the one I mentioned in the first email, are in Saraiki. While there may be a close similarity to Western Punjabi, I agree with Steven's point that the right time to bring that issue up would have been when we decided whether to mark the language as eligible. We *did* mark it as eligible (by Satdeep just over 2 years ago), and that has to mean something. To walk back on that now, after volunteers have spent hundreds and hundreds of hours working on it, is just not ok. Therefore I would like to officially propose that we approve the Saraiki Wikipedia, as they meet all of our criteria. [1] I'll be happy to disclose his name and details on the private list if anyone on the committee wants me to, but I don't want to do so here on the public list since I never brought that up with him. ons. 16. okt. 2019 kl. 18:04 skrev Jon Harald Søby &lt;jhsoby(a)gmail.com&gt;om>: I have not gotten a reply yet. Yesterday I emailed to more people from Pakistani universities with Saraiki departments, but no reply from any if them yet either. ons. 16. okt. 2019, 16:29 skrev Steven White &lt;koala19890(a)hotmail.com&gt;om>: Have we heard from the expert yet? On a related subject: Do we have any Wiktionary experts here? Saraiki Wiktionary is also now approvable in theory (assuming that the language issue on the Wikipedia clears). My concern about the Saraiki Wiktionary is only that compared to a lot of Wiktionary projects, this one appears pretty basic to me: just a straight Saraiki dictionary, with little in the way of bells and whistles (pronunciation, translations to other languages, etc.). But that's just based on the gross appearance of pages, as I do not read Saraiki (or any other language written in Perso-Arabic script). So Satdeep and anyone else: Does the content look ok? Are there greater expectations of what a Wiktionary should contain—expectations we have not communicated, I will add—or is this project appropriate and acceptable? Steven Sent from Outlook <https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Faka.ms%2Fweboutlook&data=02%7C01%7C%7C068e7dc2150941c9230e08d75aef1ee4%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637077855372258761&sdata=IGPUr9peR48UjQDnnr5lVxSPRioTAKpfPQSVFiVLLqg%3D&reserved=0> ------------------------------ *From:* Langcom &lt;langcom-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org&gt; on behalf of Jon Harald Søby &lt;jhsoby(a)gmail.com&gt; *Sent:* Thursday, October 10, 2019 3:38 PM *To:* Wikimedia Foundation Language Committee &lt;langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org *Subject:* Re: [Langcom] Wikipedia in Saraiki I am still waiting to hear back from the expert. If he says the rest of the pages look fine, then I think we can move forward – Steven makes some good points as usual. tor. 10. okt. 2019 kl. 21:03 skrev Gerard Meijssen < gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com&gt;gt;: Hoi, The final stage is that we verify if the language it is said to be. When we find it is not or are not certain we have all the room to seek another authority to move forward. At this stage it becomes confusing and I am not convinced at all that we should. Thanks, GerardM On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 at 19:21, Steven White &lt;koala19890(a)hotmail.com&gt; wrote: This is effectively the same problem as we saw in the discussion of Montenegrin Wikipedia—although since all but two of us are from Europe, North America or Israel, we feel more confident making calls in a case like Montenegrin than we do here. (And, candidly, there is less chance in the Montenegrin case of being accused of racism/Euro-centrism, even if that accusation would be totally without merit in this case.) But as I said back then, the rule as currently written is fine when the language area starts with a clean slate. If there were no Western Punjabi Wikipedia now, we could reasonably try to get a single project to try to accommodate both Western Punjabi and Saraiki. (Whether that effort would be successful is a different question, but we could try.) However, I take Satdeep's comment below to indicate that there would be serious problems trying to integrate a new Saraiki-language community into a ten-year old Western Punjabi-language community, and that he recommends against it, based on the current "facts on the ground". Besides, to some extent the time to say "no" has passed, since Satdeep marked the project as "eligible" in 2017. So I think we need to move forward with this. Steven Sent from Outlook <https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Faka.ms%2Fweboutlook&data=02%7C01%7C%7C068e7dc2150941c9230e08d75aef1ee4%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637077855372268770&sdata=7LkZK3TFcYhgd9nSLrMgNaZdR2CxsnEKGdv%2FmkCNSwE%3D&reserved=0> ------------------------------ *From:* Langcom &lt;langcom-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org&gt; on behalf of Jon Harald Søby &lt;jhsoby(a)gmail.com&gt; *Sent:* Wednesday, October 9, 2019 4:44 AM *To:* Wikimedia Foundation Language Committee &lt;langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org *Subject:* Re: [Langcom] Wikipedia in Saraiki ... As for the Western Punjabi/Saraiki issue, I don't know enough about that to have any opinion either way. tir. 8. okt. 2019 kl. 19:00 skrev Satdeep Gill &lt;satdeepgill(a)gmail.com&gt;om>: ... P.S. Western Punjabi and Saraiki are pretty similar and my personal view is that this should be accommodated on one Wikipedia but the sociology-political situation in Pakistan calls for a separate Wikipedia for Saraiki. Regards Satdeep Gill _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom <https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.wikimedia.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Flangcom&data=02%7C01%7C%7C068e7dc2150941c9230e08d75aef1ee4%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637077855372268770&sdata=70A9bZIjJTe4%2BFlUO3IXILzsNHtF%2BHMex16nYlSS3lo%3D&reserved=0> _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom <https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.wikimedia.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Flangcom&data=02%7C01%7C%7C068e7dc2150941c9230e08d75aef1ee4%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637077855372268770&sdata=70A9bZIjJTe4%2BFlUO3IXILzsNHtF%2BHMex16nYlSS3lo%3D&reserved=0> -- mvh Jon Harald Søby _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom <https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.wikimedia.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Flangcom&data=02%7C01%7C%7C068e7dc2150941c9230e08d75aef1ee4%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637077855372278775&sdata=arfRgGfkKAx4U9L64K8BrdPr4CBJRg8RXuwB4APJ0Is%3D&reserved=0> -- mvh Jon Harald Søby _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom <https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.wikimedia.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Flangcom&data=02%7C01%7C%7C068e7dc2150941c9230e08d75aef1ee4%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637077855372278775&sdata=arfRgGfkKAx4U9L64K8BrdPr4CBJRg8RXuwB4APJ0Is%3D&reserved=0> _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom <https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.wikimedia.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Flangcom&data=02%7C01%7C%7C068e7dc2150941c9230e08d75aef1ee4%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637077855372288784&sdata=3d9tKR9p4zAho4Ys53eMPSmAbhRyc24vTyO4PtKs0dE%3D&reserved=0> _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom <https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.wikimedia.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Flangcom&data=02%7C01%7C%7C068e7dc2150941c9230e08d75aef1ee4%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637077855372288784&sdata=3d9tKR9p4zAho4Ys53eMPSmAbhRyc24vTyO4PtKs0dE%3D&reserved=0> _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom

Well, as I have said many times, the current rule as written is problematic, and we have no business rejecting Montenegrin at this point.

The policy, as written, says *"The committee does not consider political differences, since the Wikimedia Foundation's goal is to give every single person free, unbiased access to the sum of all human knowledge, rather than information from the viewpoint of individual political communities."* You have to read the whole sentence there, not just the first phrase. By "not consider[ing]" political differences, the committee in fact perpetuates the fact that *existing* projects may already have "the viewpoint of individual political communities". In these cases, people in minority communities are tremendously disadvantaged in that they have to overcome (possibly) hostile political/cultural viewpoints—and may well not be able to do so.

My point is that these "politically-motivated claims" are already facts on the ground, whether you like it or not. Steven White ------------------------------ *From:* Langcom &lt;langcom-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org&gt; on behalf of MF-Warburg &lt;mfwarburg(a)googlemail.com&gt; *Sent:* Tuesday, October 29, 2019, 8:43 PM *To:* Wikimedia Foundation Language Committee *Subject:* Re: [Langcom] Wikipedia in Saraiki Am Mo., 28. Okt. 2019 um 16:08 Uhr schrieb Steven White < koala19890(a)hotmail.com&gt;gt;: No, Langcom has "every business" to do so. Your interpretation is exactly the opposite of what is written. The intention of the policy certainly was not to give every politically differing group their own wiki. Thank you for your explanation in your other mail of why it is difficult to achieve a true NPOV. However, who has claimed that Langcom should NPOVs on any wiki? One of the purposes of Langcom is to prevent the multiplication of wikis due to politically motivated claims that one language is actually two. _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom

P.S. Western Punjabi and Saraiki are pretty similar and my personal view