Am Mo., 28. Okt. 2019 um 16:08 Uhr schrieb Steven White <
koala19890(a)hotmail.com>gt;:
Well, as I have said many times, the current rule as
written is
problematic, and we have no business rejecting Montenegrin at this point.
No, Langcom has "every business" to do so.
The policy, as written, says *"The committee does
not consider political
differences, since the Wikimedia Foundation's goal is to give every single
person free, unbiased access to the sum of all human knowledge, rather than
information from the viewpoint of individual political communities."* You
have to read the whole sentence there, not just the first phrase. By "not
consider[ing]" political differences, the committee in fact perpetuates the
fact that *existing* projects may already have "the viewpoint of
individual political communities". In these cases, people in minority
communities are tremendously disadvantaged in that they have to overcome
(possibly) hostile political/cultural viewpoints—and may well not be able
to do so.
Your interpretation is exactly the opposite of what is written. The
intention of the policy certainly was not to give every politically
differing group their own wiki.
Thank you for your explanation in your other mail of why it is difficult to
achieve a true NPOV. However, who has claimed that Langcom should NPOVs on
any wiki?
One of the purposes of Langcom is to prevent the multiplication of wikis
due to politically motivated claims that one language is actually two.