Hi, all!
I am the president of Wikimedia Norge now, and we have a project idea to
create Wikipedias in Kven [fkv] (5000 speakers in Norway), Southern Sami
[sma] (600 speakers in Norway and Sweden) and Lule Sami [smj] (2000
speakers in Norway and Sweden). I am not suggesting to bypass the Incubator
or translation requirements or anything, but I need your input before we
start: Do you think these languages are viable/"big" enough to warrant
their own Wikipedias?
--
mvh
Jon Harald Søby <http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Jon_Harald_S%C3%B8by>
Hi Kat,
as a Langcom member in charge of project closures, I'd like to bring
forward two closure proposal's to the Board's attention, on which we
recommend to close these wikis:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposals_for_closing_projects/Closure_of_A…
Rationale: Only 5 pages in the mainspace, thereof maybe 3 "real" ones. This
clearly fulfilles the criterion of "Absence of content since the wiki's
creation", in my opinion. Additionally the request has been open since
November 2012. Most commentators support a closure, with the notable
exception of one Amharic user who misunderstood the proposal as "removing
the possibility of Amharic Wikiquote" and argued that the project would
need more time. He has however also not become active.Therefore, we propose
to close (and move the content to Incubator).
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposals_for_closing_projects/Closure_of_U…
This is a clear case of absence of content (<
https://uz.wikibooks.org/wiki/Maxsus:AllPages>, many pages only contain one
link or image or so) and total inactivity. Therefore, we also propose to
close (and move the content to Incubator).
Best regards,
MF-Warburg
Hi all,
we have 4 closure proposals for which I would like to propose decisions:
# 1
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposals_for_closing_projects/Closure_of_A…
The proposer says: *"This wiki only has 5
pages<https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/am:Special:Allpages>in the
mainspace:
*
1. *A redirect*
2. *The Main Page*
3. *A page with just a link in it (supposed to be a redirect or list?)*
4. *A quote from Martin Luther King Jr.*
5. *A list (I don't know what this means, but I'll assume it's content)"*
This clearly fulfilles the criterion of "Absence of content since the
wiki's creation", in my opinion. Additionally the request has been open
since November 2012. Most commentator support a closure, with the notable
exception of one Amharic user who misunderstood the proposal as "removing
the possibility of Amharic Wikiquote" and argued that the project would
need more time. He has however also not become active.
Therefore, I propose MOVE TO INCUBATOR.
# 2
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposals_for_closing_projects/Closure_of_U…
This is a clear case of absence of content (<
https://uz.wikibooks.org/wiki/Maxsus:AllPages>, many pages only contain one
link or image or so) and total inactivity. Therefore, MOVE TO INCUBATOR.
# 3
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposals_for_closing_projects/Closure_of_N…
This was proposed in the wake of a very long discussion about the
usefulness of Wikinews here:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Proposals_for_closing_projects/Archive…
Some people searched for an inactive Wikinews to propose it for closure,
with the argumentation that Wikinews needs to have a certain activity
standard to be useful (*Even if "no activity is cited not as a reason to
close a project - a dead wikinews project happens to be a different reason.
As stated by many users for many times, wikinews has a unique problem among
wikimedia-projects. The content in the wiki gets less valuable the more
time has passed. Wikinews does not produce the kind of quality which passes
the test of time). *In response, some supporters of Wikinews started
translating some articles from the English Wikinews to Norwegian. Jon
Harald said they were bad machine translations - maybe you can clarify?
I do however not know to what extent these translations still go on today.
It seems like the last recent activity was on June 10 (<
https://no.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=Spesial:Siste_endringer&days=30&f…>).
While this is not exactly brilliant, the project certainly has no absence
of content, and from past experience of moving the even larger inactive
Wikinewses in Dutch and Hungarian back to Incubator, I have seen that
1) the import process will be long and annoying
2) activity restart is of course much more likely, and better visible on
the own subdomain.
Therefore, I propose to KEEP.
# 4
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposals_for_closing_projects/Closure_of_X…
Closure was proposed for inactivity; apart for the fact that the proposer
unfortunately did not reply to any further inquiries (such as whether he
thought content should be moved to Incubator, etc. - he seems to have
thought of a deletion initally?), we all know that "inactivity alone is no
valid reason for closure". The project can also not be called of having
absence of content.
What is more, there is some recent activity
https://xh.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:RecentChanges (maybe also sparked by
the closure proposal). So, I propose to KEEP.
Best regards,
MF-Warburg