Hi everyone
Tobias Schonwetter, as mentioned in an email last week, has put together a really helpful document about what type of legal vehicle should be used for the proposed SA Chapter. This document, which I've attached here, outlines the considerations taken in drafting this opinion. Tobias (with the support of Chetty Law) suggest that we go with a Section 21 company.
Thank you so much to Tobias for this document; it is really helpful and outlines very clearly the issues for everyone. Please note that Tobias alludes to the 'financial services sector' in the document, as within the discussion during the kickoff workshop, it was mentioned by myself and Achal that we had had an indication of initial interest from this sector about the Chapter.
Please can we all consider the attached document. I would like to suggest that its open for discussion and debate until *Thursday, 2nd September*, following which a final decision will be taken about the legal vehicle.
So if you have concerns or opinions, please voice them between now and Thurs.
Regards
Kerryn * * * * KERRYN MCKAY director, The African Commons Project
email me at: kerryn@africancommons.org phone me: +2711 486 0211, cell: +27 82 334 6165, skype me: kerrynmac
Kerryn McKay wrote:
Tobias Schonwetter, as mentioned in an email last week, has put together a really helpful document about what type of legal vehicle should be used for the proposed SA Chapter. This document, which I've attached here, outlines the considerations taken in drafting this opinion. Tobias (with the support of Chetty Law) suggest that we go with a Section 21 compan
Thanks Tobias, I'm happy to go with the recommendation.
I support the recommendation to use a Sec. 21 company instead of a trust or a voluntary organisation.
Thanks for the detailed document Tobias. I also support the use of a Section 21 Company over a VA.
Kind regards,
Lourie
--- On Mon, 8/30/10, Kerryn McKay kerryn@africancommons.org wrote:
From: Kerryn McKay kerryn@africancommons.org Subject: [Wikimedia ZA] Legal opinion on proposed Chapter To: "wikimediaza" wikimediaza@lists.wikimedia.org Date: Monday, August 30, 2010, 9:06 PM
Hi everyone
Tobias Schonwetter, as mentioned in an email last week, has put together a really helpful document about what type of legal vehicle should be used for the proposed SA Chapter. This document, which I've attached here, outlines the considerations taken in drafting this opinion. Tobias (with the support of Chetty Law) suggest that we go with a Section 21 company.
Thank you so much to Tobias for this document; it is really helpful and outlines very clearly the issues for everyone. Please
note that Tobias alludes to the 'financial services sector' in the document, as within the discussion during the kickoff workshop, it was mentioned by myself and Achal that we had had an indication of initial interest from this sector about the Chapter.
Please can we all consider the attached document. I would like to suggest that its open for discussion and debate until Thursday, 2nd September, following which a final decision will be taken about the legal vehicle.
So if you have concerns or opinions, please voice them between now and Thurs.
Regards
Kerryn * * * * KERRYN MCKAY director, The African Commons Project
email me at: kerryn@africancommons.org phone me: +2711 486 0211, cell: +27 82 334 6165, skype me: kerrynmac
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
_______________________________________________ WikimediaZA mailing list WikimediaZA@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaza
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 8:06 PM, Kerryn McKay kerryn@africancommons.orgwrote:
Tobias Schonwetter, as mentioned in an email last week, has put together a really helpful document about what type of legal vehicle should be used for the proposed SA Chapter. This document, which I've attached here, outlines the considerations taken in drafting this opinion. Tobias (with the support of Chetty Law) suggest that we go with a Section 21 company.
Thank you, Tobias. I also support your recommendation.
-- Jan
Thank you Tobias and happy to go with the Section 21 option.
Have a fabulous day everyone.
Charlene
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 8:06 PM, Kerryn McKay kerryn@africancommons.orgwrote:
Hi everyone
Tobias Schonwetter, as mentioned in an email last week, has put together a really helpful document about what type of legal vehicle should be used for the proposed SA Chapter. This document, which I've attached here, outlines the considerations taken in drafting this opinion. Tobias (with the support of Chetty Law) suggest that we go with a Section 21 company.
Thank you so much to Tobias for this document; it is really helpful and outlines very clearly the issues for everyone. Please note that Tobias alludes to the 'financial services sector' in the document, as within the discussion during the kickoff workshop, it was mentioned by myself and Achal that we had had an indication of initial interest from this sector about the Chapter.
Please can we all consider the attached document. I would like to suggest that its open for discussion and debate until *Thursday, 2nd September*, following which a final decision will be taken about the legal vehicle.
So if you have concerns or opinions, please voice them between now and Thurs.
Regards
Kerryn
KERRYN MCKAY director, The African Commons Project
email me at: kerryn@africancommons.org phone me: +2711 486 0211, cell: +27 82 334 6165, skype me: kerrynmac
WikimediaZA mailing list WikimediaZA@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaza
wikimediaza@lists.wikimedia.org