On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 17:20, Vickram Crishna <vvcrishna(a)radiophony.com>wrote;wrote:
Oh, the mention of 'idiot' on that page is
vandalism (no, I haven't done
it - yet)? I thought we had a very interesting discussion about current
affairs at WikiConf where there seemed to be a consensus that presenting
every side of the picture is important.
Adding "idiot" in the lead section describing him is certainly vandalism.
Infact the surprising and best thing was the anon vandalism was reverted by
IP editors. I requested a 2 day semi protection since it might be highly
accessed page and there might be more vandals around. Tinu went ahead and
gave it 1 week semi protection. :)
Is reporting the fact that major websites like
hundreds or thousands of Twitter users are tweeting the hashtag
#IdiotKapilSibal wrong, in that case?
No, Please add to the controversy subsection and improve it with proper
references, those will not be vandalism. But one needs to be autoconfirmed
user to edit this week. More reasons to create an account and start editing