On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 17:20, Vickram Crishna <vvcrishna@radiophony.com> wrote:
Oh, the mention of 'idiot' on that page is vandalism (no, I haven't done it - yet)? I thought we had a very interesting discussion about current affairs at WikiConf where there seemed to be a consensus that presenting every side of the picture is important. 

Adding "idiot" in the lead section describing him is certainly vandalism. Infact the surprising and best thing was the anon vandalism was reverted by IP editors. I requested a 2 day semi protection since it might be highly accessed page and there might be more vandals around. Tinu went ahead and gave it 1 week semi protection. :)
Is reporting the fact that major websites like Kafila.org and literally hundreds or thousands of Twitter users are tweeting the hashtag #IdiotKapilSibal wrong, in that case?

No, Please add to the controversy subsection and improve it with proper references, those will not be vandalism. But one needs to be autoconfirmed user to edit this week. More reasons to create an account and start editing :)