Muke Tever wrote:
I was suspecting that the lack of "printable
version" in monobook indicated that rules for printouts were indicated in the
stylesheet itself, and after a quick test just now this indeed appears to be the case.
(This is hardly intuitive--not knowing this, on Wikipedia recently I have been switching
to classic skin to get printable versions.)
Yes, I must say I wouldn't have thought of this, and a non-technical
user would almost certainly just think "this won't look very good
printed out". I wonder if there's some way of making it more obvious
that this is the case...
--
Rowan Collins BSc
[IMSoP]