Hi all,
Nevio -- I'm not a list admin team either, but I am with OQ. It isn't a matter of whether a discussion doesn't belong on list X, then it must go to Y. In order for it to be relative to both X or Y, it should be about the software. How the software is used and the philosophy behind it falls outside of all of the Mediawiki mailing lists (it seems after a quick glance).
Another point is that the mediawiki-l list description falls under "Help & info for system administrators" and below that, the comment "If you are having difficulty with your own installation of MediaWiki, then this is the place to ask for help."
Perhaps it is just unfortunate that wikipedia, wikimedia, and mediawiki (especially the last 2) have similar names. The last one is the software; the first two are two cases of how they are used, which are perhaps interesting to talk about elsewhere.
Of course, if you (or Bernard) see some relevance in the question that I have failed to see, please let me know...
Ray
nevio carlos de alarcão wrote:
I am not from the list admin team bur I think the proposed subject fits entirely this mailing list. Exclusively Tech matters should go to tech list, which is not this case. Att, Nevio
2010/5/28 OQ overlordq@gmail.com
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 4:09 AM, Bernard@bernardHulsman.nl bernard@bernardhulsman.nl wrote:
How the community act if our high moral standards are abused? Block legal authorities because these authorities can not fulfil our high level of moral standards?
With regards,
Bernard
What legal authorities and what moral standards would they violate WRT mediawiki? Not following the GPL? That's about all I can think of unless you're confusing wikipedia, mediawiki, and wikimedia. IMO this question is more appropriate directed at a specific project rather then at the people writing the software.
MediaWiki-l mailing list MediaWiki-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l