Hi all,
Nevio -- I'm not a list admin team either, but I am with OQ.
It isn't a matter of whether a discussion doesn't belong
on list X, then it must go to Y. In order for it to be
relative to both X or Y, it should be about the software.
How the software is used and the philosophy behind it falls
outside of all of the Mediawiki mailing lists (it seems
after a quick glance).
Another point is that the mediawiki-l list description falls
under "Help & info for system administrators" and below
that, the comment "If you are having difficulty with your
own installation of MediaWiki, then this is the place to ask
for help."
Perhaps it is just unfortunate that wikipedia, wikimedia,
and mediawiki (especially the last 2) have similar names.
The last one is the software; the first two are two cases of
how they are used, which are perhaps interesting to talk
about elsewhere.
Of course, if you (or Bernard) see some relevance in the
question that I have failed to see, please let me know...
Ray
nevio carlos de alarcão wrote:
I am not from the list admin team bur I think the
proposed subject fits
entirely this mailing list. Exclusively Tech matters should go to tech list,
which is not this case.
Att, Nevio
2010/5/28 OQ <overlordq(a)gmail.com>
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 4:09 AM,
Bernard(a)bernardHulsman.nl
<bernard(a)bernardhulsman.nl> wrote:
How the community act if our high moral standards
are abused? Block
legal authorities because these authorities can not fulfil our high
level of moral standards?
With regards,
Bernard
What legal authorities and what moral standards would they violate WRT
mediawiki? Not following the GPL? That's about all I can think of
unless you're confusing wikipedia, mediawiki, and wikimedia. IMO this
question is more appropriate directed at a specific project rather
then at the people writing the software.
_______________________________________________
MediaWiki-l mailing list
MediaWiki-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l