The report would have been written earlier, the accounts submitted to the
Chapter and anything released to the Community only be done once due
process at the Chapter end is over hence the time delay. If you could
kindly specify which person/s spent "thousands of hours" on the
WikiConference and was/were criticised then one can answer what was the
rationale behind the complaints against him/her/them, if any.
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 8:43 PM, Ravishankar <ravidreams(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi User:Prad2609 and AroundTheGlobe,
* For a report written 6 months after the event, I find it completely
unprofessional and shamefully name calling. You have pushed the people who
have spent thousands of hours helping to the footer while criticising all
the people prominently upfront.
* Was the conference conducted by two people or the Mumbai Wikipedia
community? If you two are too busy to answer questions, there should be
other responsible members who can answer.
* *Where can I find the finance / audit report on how the $40,000 grant
and the user registration money was spent?*
I don't think this report does any good for Indian Wikipedia community to
organise any collaborative event in future. You should learn to assume
responsibility, thank the positive help and suggest best practices instead
of writing sob stories.
Wikimediaindia-l mailing list
To unsubscribe from the list / change mailing preferences visit