On 4/7/06, John Wiedenhoeft <wiedenhoeft(a)gmx.net> wrote:
Stupid question: if you have to categorize a category
as a subcategory
of another category, there will always be at least one category that's
still red, unless you build up circles?
>
> 4) The red category link is an indication that either:
> a) This is a newish category which hasn't yet been categorized itself
> or
> b) The category name was mistyped.
Well, it IS a bit metaphysical.
To get a sense of how it works on wikipedia look at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Fundamental
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category_talk:Fundamental
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Categories
Which I think should be the only uncategorized category, which is why,
in turn I believe is the motivation for the special page:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Uncategorizedcategories
Which I think is there to look for problem categories, and which
doesn't seem to be real time.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category_talk:Categories
--
Rick DeNatale
Visit the Project Mercury Wiki Site
http://www.mercuryspacecraft.com/