David Gerard wrote:
On 19 May 2010 15:50, Robert Cummings
<robert(a)interjinn.com> wrote:
I have to disagree with you given my experience.
In one government
department where MediaWiki was installed we saw the active user base
spike from about 1000 users to about 8000 users within a month of having
enabled FCKeditor. FCKeditor definitely has it's warts, but it very
closely matches the experience non-technical people have gotten used to
while using Word or WordPerfect. Leveraging skills people already have
cuts down on training costs and allows them to be productive almost
immediately.
Our main problem is how to make things work for people who want
WYSIWYG and people who want wikitext. I thought this was what CK in MW
was working on ...
Should the page for the relevant extension be marked "no longer being
worked on" or "your bugs are going into a void"?
In my particular case I get to fix the bugs and enhance both MediaWiki
and FCKeditor :) Unfortunately, at this time I am unable to pass fixes
back to the community due to contracting issues and how it relates to
GPL. This is being addressed and hopefully in the near future updates
can be contributed back as one would expect when using open-source.
As an example, I think every version of FCKeditor I've seen so far used
with MediaWiki has broken search/replace. This is fixed for us :)
Cheers,
Rob.
--
http://www.interjinn.com
Application and Templating Framework for PHP