Nick Bell wrote:
In other
words: if there's no open access, it's not a Wiki.
OK, but surely it's legitimate (in some other equally valid sense) to
use a Wiki for the benefit of a community, albeit a closed one?
I don't think it's a question of legitimate versus illegitimate. I -would- say
that it's probably not a big development priority for MediaWiki to make
restricted use features.
Anyways, WikiNature is probably off-topic for this list. Let's take this
discussion to private email if you'd like to talk further.
I have looked far and wide for a CMS system that meets
my needs.
MediaWiki seems to be the most promising at present.
That's great! What a good endorsement.
~ESP