Lee Daniel Crocker wrote:
One thing I noticed after resurrecting the test suite:
text in
double tics is now rendered as "<i>" instead of "<em>".
Was this
a consciously-made change, or just an error introduced into the
parser at some point?
I used <em> when I rewrote the apostrophe-handling bit. It was later
changed to <i> on the grounds that we use double-apostrophes for things
like citations (should be <cite>), variables (should be <var>) as well
as emphasis, so always using <em> was deemed inappropriate.
Timwi