it from a shell, are you running $hs-pandoc or
$pandoc?
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 4:14 PM, Jon Theil Nielsen <jontheil(a)gmail.com
<javascript:;>> wrote:
Dear list,
On a server running FreeBSD 10.2-Release, I had no problems to configure
www/mediawiki125. I do not use many extensions but would like to use
Html2Wiki.
I have installed it according to the guide at
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Html2Wiki. Therefore, I also
installed textproc/hs-pandoc.
When I add the line "require_once
"$IP/extensions/Html2Wiki/Html2Wiki.php";" to LocalSettings.php and
reloaded apache, the only thing to see on the wiki page is something like
"Html2Wiki requires pandoc.".
The pandoc command is in the path (I can run it from a shell).
On FreeBSD, hs-pandoc is the main pacdoc port/package. If I run
#pandoc -v
the output is:
"pandoc 1.15.0.6
Compiled with texmath 0.8.3, highlighting-kate 0.6.
Syntax highlighting is supported for the following languages:
abc, actionscript, ada, agda, apache, asn1, asp, awk, bash, bibtex,
boo, c,
changelog, clojure, cmake, coffee, coldfusion, commonlisp, cpp, cs,
css,
curry, d, diff, djangotemplate, dockerfile, dot, doxygen, doxygenlua,
dtd,
eiffel, email, erlang, fasm, fortran, fsharp, gcc, glsl, gnuassembler,
go,
haskell, haxe, html, idris, ini, isocpp, java, javadoc, javascript,
json,
jsp, julia, kotlin, latex, lex, lilypond, literatecurry,
literatehaskell,
lua, m4, makefile, mandoc, markdown, mathematica, matlab, maxima,
mediawiki,
metafont, mips, modelines, modula2, modula3, monobasic, nasm, noweb,
objectivec, objectivecpp, ocaml, octave, opencl, pascal, perl, php,
pike,
postscript, prolog, pure, python, r, relaxng, relaxngcompact, rest,
rhtml,
roff, ruby, rust, scala, scheme, sci, sed, sgml, sql, sqlmysql,
sqlpostgresql, tcl, tcsh, texinfo, verilog, vhdl, xml, xorg, xslt, xul,
yacc, yaml, zsh
Default user data directory: /root/.pandoc
Copyright (C) 2006-2015 John MacFarlane
Web:
http://pandoc.org
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.
There is no warranty, not even for merchantability or fitness
for a particular purpose."
Doesn't that seem correct?