Platonides wrote:
nakohdo: You cannot make some templates subst by not using subst.
Thanks for clarification. Yes, a thought reading parser is still on my
wishlist ;-)
A follow-up question, though:
Technically speaking "subst:" is a parser function, isn't it? Could I a
least create an alias for it (by modifying magic words?) which is more
meaningful for non English speakers?
tia
Frank
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Hiding-%22subst%3A%22-syntax-inside-a-template-possib…
Sent from the WikiMedia General mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.