On 11/12/11 00:27, Jens Wille wrote:
but what did work, though, is a plain `convert`
(without actually
changing anything) and uploading that instead. this way it must
have gotten rid of any "garbage" there might have been.
It will have compressed it with a different dictionary, not matching
that specific sequence.
so, thanks
again. for me the problem is solved :) as far as the database issue
is concerned i don't know... to be honest, as long as it doesn't
affect me, i don't really care. i just don't understand what it's
doing there.
cheers
jens
Do you know what was the old value of img_metadata?