I just realized that your users who refuse to use the wiki and want to use Word are probably doing so because of the wikitext editor, which can be a real pain for people to switch to from Word. Over a year ago we installed the FCKeditor extension (FCKeditor+Mediawiki) which provides a WYSIWYG editor to Mediawiki. It had its bugs then but has improved a lot and I have heard no complaints from our many users. With a WYSIWYG editor you will likely have a much better response from users who switch to the wiki from Word.
-Jim
-----Original Message----- From: mediawiki-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org [mailto:mediawiki-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Chris Reigrut Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 11:53 PM To: mediawiki-l@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: Re: [Mediawiki-l] wiki versus Word
We've seen the same basic tendencies of our users to stick with what they know, which is Office documents. Yes, we much prefer it if people use a real wiki page, especially for Word documents, but frankly, I don't get all that bent out of shape about it--I'll mention it to people if it comes up, but I don't go out of my way to find people uploading those documents and trying to "convert" them. And it does make sense in some occasions: as you've mentioned, forms, final documents, but certainly for spreadsheets, presentations, etc. As someone else mentioned, keeping a Word document up-to-date is quite a pain, and I've found that people tend to migrate to wikitext after the first few iterations. We actually have extended the search engine to automatically index the text in common types of attachments so that they are searchable.
Personally, I've found that the lower-key approach works better, but your mileage may vary.
mediawiki-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org wrote:
Message: 2 Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 10:06:48 -0600 From: "McHale, Nina" Nina.McHale@ucdenver.edu Subject: [Mediawiki-l] wiki versus Word To: "mediawiki-l@lists.wikimedia.org" mediawiki-l@lists.wikimedia.org Message-ID: 3354E9B491D9EA47A1DB89BF9837636367007771F5@STEAMBOAT.ucdenver.pvt Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hey, all,
Some of my colleagues are objecting to my desire to minimize uploading of Word documents to our new intranet wiki. My main objection to it is that we ought to be entering information into wiki pages so that we can take full advantage of document versioning, talk pages, watching, etc.-y'know, the stuff that makes it a wiki...
I've been called "silly" and "arbitrary" regarding this. :) I'm not outright forbidding posting Word documents; I'm just trying to get people to use the wiki the way it's mean to be used. Am I being unreasonable? I even stated that it's acceptable to load the final version of a 20-page report, or a form that's meant to be printed out and filled out by hand-i.e., things in a final state that do not need further editing.
Has anyone else encountered this resistance? I was most surprised that it came from someone who uses/edits Wikipedia, which, as far as I can tell, does not support uploading of Word docs.
Nina Nina McHale, MA/MSLS Assistant Professor, Web Librarian Auraria Library http://library.auraria.edu/~nmchale/ Facebookhttp://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=672599042 | MySpacehttp://www.myspace.com/ninermac Serving the University of Colorado Denver, Metropolitan State College of Denver, and the Community College of Denver 1100 Lawrence Street Denver, CO 80204 303-556-4729