Fernando,
Thanks for checking! Just to clarify - are you saying the current
version of the extension runs fine with 1.9.1, or should I wait for your
next update?
(BTW, you guys can call me Mike - "Air Force" is just who I work for. :-D )
--
1st Lt Wayne "Mike" Straw
Air Force CGOC Webmaster
webmaster(a)afcgoc.org
On my first tests, the extension worked with 1.9.1. I
reapplied the patches
manually on the new version files. I had some issues with the Semantic
MediaWiki extension on MediaWiki 1.9.1, though.
I expect to release a version of the patched files next week.
Regards,
Fernando.
2007/1/27, Air Force CGOC Webmaster <webmaster(a)afcgoc.org>rg>:
Rob Church wrote:
On 27/01/07, Fernando Correia
<fernandoacorreia(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> I think this exchange of ideas is very good. I hope it can evolve and
>
help
create a
really secure access control system for MediaWiki.
(sigh)
Don't use a wiki if you want a secure access-controlled environment.
Use a proper CMS or a document management system.
Rob Church
I'm definitely not looking for a super secure access-controlled
environment. I'm building a public web page with multiple editors, and
want to prevent those editors from accidentally or intentionally
overwriting portions of the site they aren't responsible for. The Wiki
platform is perfect for what we want, with an extension like
PageSecurity (which unfortunately is not available for 1.9 yet) or Group
Based Access Control (which I'm looking at now) to provide basic editing
protection.
I'm definitely learning a lot from this debate - thanks for the info!
--
1st Lt Wayne "Mike" Straw
Air Force CGOC Webmaster
webmaster(a)afcgoc.org
http://www.afcgoc.org
_______________________________________________
MediaWiki-l mailing list
MediaWiki-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
_______________________________________________
MediaWiki-l mailing list
MediaWiki-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l