[Mediawiki-l] PageSecurity and 1.9

Fernando Correia fernandoacorreia at gmail.com
Sat Jan 27 21:53:24 UTC 2007


Sorry for not being clear.

You should wait for an update, unless you feel like applying the patches
yourself. The main source code did not need to be changed.

I expect to release this next Monday.

2007/1/27, Air Force CGOC Webmaster <webmaster at afcgoc.org>:
>
> Fernando,
>
> Thanks for checking!  Just to clarify - are you saying the current
> version of the extension runs fine with 1.9.1, or should I wait for your
> next update?
>
> (BTW, you guys can call me Mike - "Air Force" is just who I work for. :-D
> )
>
>
> --
> 1st Lt Wayne "Mike" Straw
> Air Force CGOC Webmaster
> webmaster at afcgoc.org
> http://www.afcgoc.org
>
>
> Fernando Correia wrote:
> > On my first tests, the extension worked with 1.9.1. I reapplied the
> patches
> > manually on the new version files. I had some issues with the Semantic
> > MediaWiki extension on MediaWiki 1.9.1, though.
> >
> > I expect to release a version of the patched files next week.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Fernando.
> >
> > 2007/1/27, Air Force CGOC Webmaster <webmaster at afcgoc.org>:
> >
> >> Rob Church wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 27/01/07, Fernando Correia <fernandoacorreia at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> I think this exchange of ideas is very good. I hope it can evolve and
> >>>>
> >> help
> >>
> >>>> create a really secure  access control system for MediaWiki.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> (sigh)
> >>>
> >>> Don't use a wiki if you want a secure access-controlled environment.
> >>> Use a proper CMS or a document management system.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Rob Church
> >>>
> >>>
> >> I'm definitely not looking for a super secure access-controlled
> >> environment.  I'm building a public web page with multiple editors, and
> >> want to prevent those editors from accidentally or intentionally
> >> overwriting portions of the site they aren't responsible for.  The Wiki
> >> platform is perfect for what we want, with an extension like
> >> PageSecurity (which unfortunately is not available for 1.9 yet) or
> Group
> >> Based Access Control (which I'm looking at now) to provide basic
> editing
> >> protection.
> >>
> >> I'm definitely learning a lot from this debate - thanks for the info!
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> 1st Lt Wayne "Mike" Straw
> >> Air Force CGOC Webmaster
> >> webmaster at afcgoc.org
> >> http://www.afcgoc.org
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> MediaWiki-l mailing list
> >> MediaWiki-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> >> http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
> >>
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > MediaWiki-l mailing list
> > MediaWiki-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> > http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> MediaWiki-l mailing list
> MediaWiki-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
>


More information about the MediaWiki-l mailing list