Moin,
On Friday 28 April 2006 15:24, Dave M G wrote:
Tels,
Thank you for replying.
Have you applied the latest patch (where a "(169)" is added around line 924?
I'm sorry, but I don't understand what you mean. I have MediaWiki 1.6.3. Are there patches or upgrades more recent than that?
* 1.63. is the latest. * There was a patch posted in the bug report you (and me :) read. * it revolved around adding "(160)" (not (169), sorry!) to the line.
And what do you mean a "(169)" is added around line 924? If you mean line 924 in the tables.sql file, then this is what is around that area in my tables.sql:
-- Any other parameters to the command -- Presently unused, format undefined job_params blob NOT NULL default '',
PRIMARY KEY job_id (job_id), KEY (job_cmd, job_namespace, job_title) ) TYPE=InnoDB;
No mention of a (169) anywhere.
Afterwards this file should read:
-- Jobs performed by parallel apache threads or a command-line daemon CREATE TABLE /*$wgDBprefix*/job ( job_id int(9) unsigned NOT NULL auto_increment,
-- Command name, currently only refreshLinks is defined job_cmd varchar(255) NOT NULL default '',
-- Namespace and title to act on -- Should be 0 and '' if the command does not operate on a title job_namespace int NOT NULL, job_title varchar(255) binary NOT NULL,
-- Any other parameters to the command -- Presently unused, format undefined job_params blob NOT NULL default '',
PRIMARY KEY job_id (job_id), KEY (job_cmd(160), job_namespace, job_title) ) TYPE=InnoDB;
In my case, I also replaced the (255) by (160), but I am not sure this is really nec.
Hope this helps, if not, please email me again!
Tels