I found that the easiest way to create a new page is type in the name of the
new page after the topic= in the url. Don't forget to use the "_" charater
as for any spaces in the page title.
Do I win the prize for the least number of steps? ;-)
John
-----Original Message-----
From: Rowan Collins [mailto:rowan.collins@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 10:43 AM
To: dc(a)pikkle.com; MediaWiki announcements and site admin list
Subject: Re: [Mediawiki-l] Making it easier to add
D_C <d3ntaku(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I just added a how to for "adding stuff to the
wiki" - its 10 steps!
I make it either 3 or 6, as explained below:
1: click the "edit this page" link
2: in the text box that opens, add the new item you want
2a: put it between two square brackets like [[this]]
--- This isn't really a
seperate step in the process, it is simply the
way you make a link; if you say "step 2: add a link to the new page",
this just tells you how to do it.
3: save your edits
# that will create the page as a red Link
--- This isn't a step that has to be
followed, it's information about
what you've already done.
The above 3 steps only need to be followed if nobody has already
created any links to the new page. The idea of a wiki is that pages
are interlinked as much as possible, and that users are encouraged to
link to content that doesn't exist yet, thus encouraging other users
to come along and create that content. Thus, except for on a very
young site, the majority of new pages will be created by clicking
existing links.
4 (or 1): click on the link
# that opens a new page
--- Again, that's not an instruction, so shouldn't
be counted.
# now click "edit this page" again
---
This is incorrect: since we are talking about creating a new page,
the user will have clicked a red link, and be taken to an edit box
labelled "Enter your new page below".
5 (or 2): and add your comments!
--- Or, to be
more precise, the text of your new page.
6 (or 3): and save!
--- Preferably previewing
the page first, as with anything.
Now, I'm not saying that 6 steps to create a page is ideal - although
I contend that in many circumstances there are only 3, all of which
seem pretty much like common sense. As I mentionned, it is possible to
edit the message shown on a failed press of "Go". It is also possible
for a user to manually point their browser at a non-existent article,
and then click "edit" when they get a message saying "There is no text
in this page" (this isn't obvious to everyone, but some may try it).
More importantly, you are rather implying that you can't add content
to the wiki without starting a new page, whereas in fact most content
will be added by editting existing pages. And I can't imagine a much
quicker way of doing that than "click edit; edit the text; click
save", can you?
> At the very least, if a page is empty, or someone
hits "talk" which
> seems obvious they want to add something, why make them search for the
> edit button after? Should just go to a blank page.
If a page is empty, any links to it *do* go to an edit area. If they
click "talk", they may want to read existing discussion, before or
instead of adding to it. If there is none, the page will be empty, and
they will have the chance to create it. As noted in my previous
message, all discussion pages do have an "add a section" link, but it
is not very obvious (you could make it say something other than "+" by
editting [[MediaWiki:Addsection]], but to make it really obvious I
guess you'd need a new skin)
I won't deny that the discussion system in MediaWiki leaves a lot to
be desired - in as much as there is much of a dedicated "system". This
is largely because the emphasis is on editting the content itself,
rather than just commenting on it - discussion is useful at times, but
just getting people to say "this is good" or whatever isn't the aim
*of the main projects for which MediaWiki is used* (i.e. Wikipedia,
Wiktionary, et al).
I'm afraid that if you want something that resembles a guestbook,
you'll have to edit the code (or find someone with time to do so for
you), or find a piece of software that is developed more with this
type of site in mind. [This is the open-source world's usual response
to feature requests: "so code it yourself". But I mean it in the
politest possible way, as you should see from the time I've taken to
respond.]
--
Rowan Collins BSc
[IMSoP]