Evan Prodromou wrote:
In other words: if there's no open access,
it's not a Wiki.
OK, but surely it's legitimate (in some other equally valid sense) to
use a Wiki for the benefit of a community, albeit a closed one?
Anyways, my point was that it's probably a -lot-
easier to build up from
a CMS system than to try to disable features in MediaWiki or some other
wiki engine.
I have looked far and wide for a CMS system that meets my needs.
MediaWiki seems to be the most promising at present.
Cheers,
Nick