Hi all
WMUK would like to provide better materials aimed at the general public which explain the benefits of open knowledge. I have already been signposted to some existing resources (provided by other organisations) but if you know of any really good materials on this, please let me know.
Also, if anyone would like to take on the task of writing a short, simple guide to open knowledge from a Wikimedia perspective, please let me know! This will go on our website but will also be a document that we can email to people as necessary.
Thanks Lucy
Open Knowledge, Open Data Institute, Creative Commons have lots of this kind of stuff, e.g. http://opendatahandbook.org/
This is good too: https://exposingtheinvisible.org/guides/decoding-data/
Who do you see as the audience for this guide you're proposing?
*Edward Saperia* Founder Newspeak House http://www.nwspk.com email edsaperia@gmail.com • facebook http://www.facebook.com/edsaperia • twitter http://www.twitter.com/edsaperia • 07796955572 133-135 Bethnal Green Road, E2 7DG
On 23 February 2016 at 12:27, Lucy Crompton-Reid < lucy.crompton-reid@wikimedia.org.uk> wrote:
Hi all
WMUK would like to provide better materials aimed at the general public which explain the benefits of open knowledge. I have already been signposted to some existing resources (provided by other organisations) but if you know of any really good materials on this, please let me know.
Also, if anyone would like to take on the task of writing a short, simple guide to open knowledge from a Wikimedia perspective, please let me know! This will go on our website but will also be a document that we can email to people as necessary.
Thanks Lucy
--
Lucy Crompton-Reid
Chief Executive
Wikimedia UK
+44 (0) 207 065 0991
Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT.
Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). *Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents.*
Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk
On 23 February 2016 at 12:27 Lucy Crompton-Reid lucy.crompton-reid@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
<snip>
Also, if anyone would like to take on the task of writing a short, simpleguide to open knowledge from a Wikimedia perspective, please let me know! This will go on our website but will also be a document that we can email to people as necessary.
There would be more than one "Wikimedia" perspective: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:2016_Strategy/Knowledge suggests the number could run into three figures!
My own take, I suppose, is that a handbook or manual covering "open knowledge" is more of a rarity than advocacy for its merits. Which is rather cart before the horse.
Charles
On 23 February 2016 at 12:27, Lucy Crompton-Reid lucy.crompton-reid@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
Hi all
WMUK would like to provide better materials aimed at the general public which explain the benefits of open knowledge.
What is the objective here?
I have already been signposted to some existing resources (provided by other organisations) but if you know of any really good materials on this, please let me know.
Also, if anyone would like to take on the task of writing a short, simple guide to open knowledge from a Wikimedia perspective, please let me know! This will go on our website but will also be a document that we can email to people as necessary.
As necessary for what? Outside of a few textbook and journal publishers its not as if there are many people who oppose the concept.
You want to see how open access journals are used on wikipedia?
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:Op...
Want to see some pretty pictures in use?
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Dendrogramma_enigmatica_sp._nov.,_ho... or most of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_pictures/Space/Looking_out
Want a project that could improve wikipedia's use of open access? Run Beall’s List against the database to see if there any references that need review:
https://scholarlyoa.com/publishers/
On 24 February 2016 at 03:04 geni <geniice@gmail.com> wrote: On 23 February 2016 at 12:27, Lucy Crompton-Reid <lucy.crompton-reid@wikimedia.org.uk> wrote: > > Hi all > > WMUK would like to provide better materials aimed at the general public > which explain the benefits of open knowledge. What is the objective here?
I'd agree that "short, simple guide" isn't really a brief here: more a hope for brevity (pun intended). Charles
On 24 February 2016 at 03:04, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
On 23 February 2016 at 12:27, Lucy Crompton-Reid lucy.crompton-reid@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
Hi all
WMUK would like to provide better materials aimed at the general public which explain the benefits of open knowledge.
What is the objective here?
Its now been 2 full working days. Am I to take it that there is no objective?
WMUK would like to provide better materials aimed at the general public
which explain the benefits of open knowledge.
What is the objective here?
Its now been 2 full working days. Am I to take it that there is no objective? geni
At the risk of sounding negative, I also don't think this seems like a very productive thing for the charity to spend time on. Lots of materials already exist that explain the benefits of open knowledge - and without a clear audience or channel in mind, creating more media seems a bit pointless.
*Edward Saperia* Founder Newspeak House http://www.nwspk.com/ email edsaperia@gmail.com • facebook http://www.facebook.com/edsaperia • twitter http://www.twitter.com/edsaperia • 07796955572 133-135 Bethnal Green Road, E2 7DG
I have one very small example. At a wiki meetup last month I met a the chair of a small local charity. They have an archive of interesting local material that the chair would like to consider scanning and releasing as PD or under a free licence. I was asked "do you have a short, simple, non-technical document I can give to my fellow trustees to explain why we ought to be doing this?" Although there is a lot of material out there that explains open knowledge and open licences in great detail it turns out that we don't actually have anything short and simple we can hand out or point members of the public to. And as a national charity that aspires to lead in this area we really ought to have something that concisely answers the question "why should I release my content?"
Michael
On 25 Feb 2016, at 18:31, Edward Saperia edsaperia@gmail.com wrote:
WMUK would like to provide better materials aimed at the general public which explain the benefits of open knowledge.
What is the objective here?
Its now been 2 full working days. Am I to take it that there is no objective? geni
At the risk of sounding negative, I also don't think this seems like a very productive thing for the charity to spend time on. Lots of materials already exist that explain the benefits of open knowledge - and without a clear audience or channel in mind, creating more media seems a bit pointless.
Edward Saperia Founder Newspeak House email • facebook • twitter • 07796955572 133-135 Bethnal Green Road, E2 7DG _______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk
Surely https://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/GLAM must have one, or have enough material to make one trivial to pull together?
On 25 February 2016 at 21:47, Michael Maggs michael@maggs.name wrote:
I have one very small example. At a wiki meetup last month I met a the chair of a small local charity. They have an archive of interesting local material that the chair would like to consider scanning and releasing as PD or under a free licence. I was asked "do you have a short, simple, non-technical document I can give to my fellow trustees to explain why we ought to be doing this?" Although there is a lot of material out there that explains open knowledge and open licences in great detail it turns out that we don't actually have anything short and simple we can hand out or point members of the public to. And as a national charity that aspires to lead in this area we really ought to have something that concisely answers the question "why should I release my content?"
Michael
On 25 Feb 2016, at 18:31, Edward Saperia edsaperia@gmail.com wrote:
WMUK would like to provide better materials aimed at the general public
which explain the benefits of open knowledge.
What is the objective here?
Its now been 2 full working days. Am I to take it that there is no objective? geni
At the risk of sounding negative, I also don't think this seems like a very productive thing for the charity to spend time on. Lots of materials already exist that explain the benefits of open knowledge - and without a clear audience or channel in mind, creating more media seems a bit pointless.
*Edward Saperia* Founder Newspeak House http://www.nwspk.com/ email edsaperia@gmail.com • facebook http://www.facebook.com/edsaperia • twitter http://www.twitter.com/edsaperia • 07796955572 133-135 Bethnal Green Road, E2 7DG
Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk
Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk
On 25 February 2016 at 23:00, Edward Saperia edsaperia@gmail.com wrote:
Surely https://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/GLAM must have one, or have enough material to make one trivial to pull together?
Might. Might not. They tend to focus on larger organisations.
Thanks for that clarification, Michael.
It should be noted, however, for a charity there may be a number of issues they may need to consider:
* Do they own copyright of images? Whilst generally images created by employees usually, unless otherwise stated, belong to their employers, the same does not apply to volunteers unless it is specifically included.
* Does instructing staff to investigate these issues fall within their charitable objects? Sorting out questions like the one above might take a certain amount of staff time, but unless releasing the images falls within their charitable objectives, diverting staff from core activities could be seen as an inappropriate use of charity resources.
This example immediately comes up against all sorts of specific issues which affect charities, perhaps one of the most regulated areas we could come up with.
I think Charles Matthews captured the diversity of Wikimedian views in his recent post, and I am not sure that WMUK could successfully synthesise a view point which would reflect this diversity without losing focus. Likewise Ed has indicated that there is a range of material out there which already offers a general view, even if no-one has thought to list this on the Wikipedia article.
I can't help of thinking of the wording adjacent to the very simply memorial to Sir Christopher Wren in St Paul's Cathedral: "Reader, if you seek his memorial - look around you." The day to day reality of Wikipedia is - in itself - probably one of the best argument for open knowledge. So perhaps the document should be "Using Wikimedia Commons as a repository for your Creative Commons media?" Thus guidelines could be provided for what material is suitable, what benefits arise from placing it on commons and what hoops may have to be jumped through in order to satisfy concerns about copyvio. all the best, Fabian aka Leutha
On 25 February 2016 at 21:47 Michael Maggs michael@maggs.name wrote:
I have one very small example. At a wiki meetup last month I met a the chair of a small local charity. They have an archive of interesting local material that the chair would like to consider scanning and releasing as PD or under a free licence. I was asked "do you have a short, simple, non-technical document I can give to my fellow trustees to explain why we ought to be doing this?" Although there is a lot of material out there that explains open knowledge and open licences in great detail it turns out that we don't actually have anything short and simple we can hand out or point members of the public to. And as a national charity that aspires to lead in this area we really ought to have something that concisely answers the question "why should I release my content?"
Michael
On 25 Feb 2016, at 18:31, Edward Saperia <edsaperia@gmail.com mailto:edsaperia@gmail.com > wrote:
> > > > > >> WMUK would like to provide better materials aimed at > > > > > >> the general public which explain the benefits of open > > > > > >> knowledge.> What is the objective here? Its now been 2 full working days. Am I to take it that there is noobjective? geni > >
At the risk of sounding negative, I also don't think this seems like avery productive thing for the charity to spend time on. Lots of materials already exist that explain the benefits of open knowledge - and without a clear audience or channel in mind, creating more media seems a bit pointless.
Edward Saperia Founder Newspeak House http://www.nwspk.com/ email mailto:edsaperia@gmail.com • facebookhttp://www.facebook.com/edsaperia • twitter http://www.twitter.com/edsaperia • 07796955572 133-135 Bethnal Green Road, E2 7DG
> > _______________________________________________Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org mailto:wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk
Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk
I think re: the GLAM resources, a lot of the material is about practical issues once the decision to release content has been made. Fabian rightly points out that lots of orgs are sympathetic to the desire to release content openly (or, at least, to have their content more widely used) but have various concerns or just inertia takes hold. This isn't a great example, but the JISC open access resources are targeted at HE orgs to help them overcome specific challenges, and https://www.jisc.ac.uk/content/open-access much of which could be adapted into internal business cases for a shift to OA (of course this is easier now as it's essentially mandated). There seems to be a gap in materials to support orgs in that stage, the "why we ought to be doing this?" stage, that aligns our goals in the benefits of open knowledge, with an organisations.
Simon
On 26 February 2016 at 10:04, leutha@fabiant.eu leutha@fabiant.eu wrote:
Thanks for that clarification, Michael.
It should be noted, however, for a charity there may be a number of issues they may need to consider:
- Do they own copyright of images? Whilst generally images created by
employees usually, unless otherwise stated, belong to their employers, the same does not apply to volunteers unless it is specifically included.
- Does instructing staff to investigate these issues fall within their
charitable objects? Sorting out questions like the one above might take a certain amount of staff time, but unless releasing the images falls within their charitable objectives, diverting staff from core activities could be seen as an inappropriate use of charity resources.
This example immediately comes up against all sorts of specific issues which affect charities, perhaps one of the most regulated areas we could come up with.
I think Charles Matthews captured the diversity of Wikimedian views in his recent post, and I am not sure that WMUK could successfully synthesise a view point which would reflect this diversity without losing focus. Likewise Ed has indicated that there is a range of material out there which already offers a general view, even if no-one has thought to list this on the Wikipedia article.
I can't help of thinking of the wording adjacent to the very simply memorial to Sir Christopher Wren in St Paul's Cathedral: "Reader, if you seek his memorial - look around you." The day to day reality of Wikipedia *is - *in itself - probably one of the best argument for open knowledge. So perhaps the document should be "Using Wikimedia Commons as a repository for your Creative Commons media?" Thus guidelines could be provided for what material is suitable, what benefits arise from placing it on commons and what hoops may have to be jumped through in order to satisfy concerns about copyvio. all the best, Fabian aka Leutha
On 25 February 2016 at 21:47 Michael Maggs michael@maggs.name wrote:
I have one very small example. At a wiki meetup last month I met a the chair of a small local charity. They have an archive of interesting local material that the chair would like to consider scanning and releasing as PD or under a free licence. I was asked "do you have a short, simple, non-technical document I can give to my fellow trustees to explain why we ought to be doing this?" Although there is a lot of material out there that explains open knowledge and open licences in great detail it turns out that we don't actually have anything short and simple we can hand out or point members of the public to. And as a national charity that aspires to lead in this area we really ought to have something that concisely answers the question "why should I release my content?"
Michael
On 25 Feb 2016, at 18:31, Edward Saperia edsaperia@gmail.com wrote:
WMUK would like to provide better materials aimed at the general public
which explain the benefits of open knowledge.
What is the objective here?
Its now been 2 full working days. Am I to take it that there is no objective? geni
At the risk of sounding negative, I also don't think this seems like a very productive thing for the charity to spend time on. Lots of materials already exist that explain the benefits of open knowledge - and without a clear audience or channel in mind, creating more media seems a bit pointless.
*Edward Saperia* Founder Newspeak House http://www.nwspk.com/ email edsaperia@gmail.com • facebook http://www.facebook.com/edsaperia • twitter http://www.twitter.com/edsaperia • 07796955572 133-135 Bethnal Green Road, E2 7DG
Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk
Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk
Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk
On 26/02/16 00:27, Simon Knight wrote:
This isn't a great example, but the JISC open access resources are targeted at HE orgs to help them overcome specific challenges, and https://www.jisc.ac.uk/content/open-access much of which could be adapted into internal business cases for a shift to OA (of course this is easier now as it's essentially mandated).
Open DOAR
https://www.jisc.ac.uk/opendoar
I like that!
:-)
Gordo
On 25 February 2016 at 21:47 Michael Maggs michael@maggs.name wrote:
<snip>
And as a national charity that aspires to lead in this area we reallyought to have something that concisely answers the question "why should I release my content?"
A flyer, then. Starting from the existing "How to work successfully with Wikipedia", strip out the case studies, remove the WiR material, reduce to one side of A4. The key points should all be there.
Charles
On 26 February 2016 at 09:41, Charles Matthews charles.r.matthews@ntlworld.com wrote:
On 25 February 2016 at 21:47 Michael Maggs michael@maggs.name wrote:
<snip> And as a national charity that aspires to lead in this area we really ought to have something that concisely answers the question "why should I release my content?"
A flyer, then. Starting from the existing "How to work successfully with Wikipedia", strip out the case studies, remove the WiR material, reduce to one side of A4. The key points should all be there.
Charles
I would make the flyer generic, it can then be used by other English speaking organizations and shared on the Outreach wiki rather than hidden away on the chapter wiki and appearing like proprietary marketing. WMUK has co-funded many Wikimedian in Residence positions over the last five years, several have contributed materials and case studies to the Outreach wiki, contacting them and the current Wikimedians in Residence directly would get the flier produced on a good-will basis with no staff support needed. It could even be declared as an outcome of one of the funded projects, if that is important.
Fae
Hello hello. Existing WiR here (Museums Galleries Scotland), happy to collaborate on this. Have had contact with ~26 different GLAMs over the past year, of varying sizes. I'm at user:lirazelf. if someone wants to do the design, I'll do the text.
S
Sent from my iPhone
On 26 Feb 2016, at 09:51, Fæ faewik@gmail.com wrote:
On 26 February 2016 at 09:41, Charles Matthews charles.r.matthews@ntlworld.com wrote:
On 25 February 2016 at 21:47 Michael Maggs michael@maggs.name wrote:
<snip> And as a national charity that aspires to lead in this area we really ought to have something that concisely answers the question "why should I release my content?"
A flyer, then. Starting from the existing "How to work successfully with Wikipedia", strip out the case studies, remove the WiR material, reduce to one side of A4. The key points should all be there.
Charles
I would make the flyer generic, it can then be used by other English speaking organizations and shared on the Outreach wiki rather than hidden away on the chapter wiki and appearing like proprietary marketing. WMUK has co-funded many Wikimedian in Residence positions over the last five years, several have contributed materials and case studies to the Outreach wiki, contacting them and the current Wikimedians in Residence directly would get the flier produced on a good-will basis with no staff support needed. It could even be declared as an outcome of one of the funded projects, if that is important.
Fae
Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk
Dear all
Thanks for all your comments and input into this. I can understand why those working closely within the open knowledge sector might feel there isn't a need for information about why this matters, but the audience we're aiming this at are people working in smaller organisations and societies, or simply interested members of the public, who need an introduction to open. The idea would be to signpost to other, more comprehensive materials, rather than to reinvent the wheel. And I'm not imagining this would be a very time-consuming exercise. I think despite all the barriers and issues raised it makes sense that this information is contained somewhere on our website (although of course, it could be shared and re-used by anyone who wanted it!) In the first instance we are looking for some text, so your offer is greatly appreciated Sara! I'll get in touch with you separately about taking this forward.
All best Lucy
On 26 February 2016 at 09:56, Sara Thomas sa.thomas@live.com wrote:
Hello hello. Existing WiR here (Museums Galleries Scotland), happy to collaborate on this. Have had contact with ~26 different GLAMs over the past year, of varying sizes. I'm at user:lirazelf. if someone wants to do the design, I'll do the text.
S
Sent from my iPhone
On 26 Feb 2016, at 09:51, Fæ faewik@gmail.com wrote:
On 26 February 2016 at 09:41, Charles Matthews charles.r.matthews@ntlworld.com wrote:
On 25 February 2016 at 21:47 Michael Maggs michael@maggs.name wrote:
<snip> And as a national charity that aspires to lead in this area we really
ought
to have something that concisely answers the question "why should I
release
my content?"
A flyer, then. Starting from the existing "How to work successfully with Wikipedia", strip out the case studies, remove the WiR material, reduce
to
one side of A4. The key points should all be there.
Charles
I would make the flyer generic, it can then be used by other English speaking organizations and shared on the Outreach wiki rather than hidden away on the chapter wiki and appearing like proprietary marketing. WMUK has co-funded many Wikimedian in Residence positions over the last five years, several have contributed materials and case studies to the Outreach wiki, contacting them and the current Wikimedians in Residence directly would get the flier produced on a good-will basis with no staff support needed. It could even be declared as an outcome of one of the funded projects, if that is important.
Fae
Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk
Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk
On 26/02/16 10:14, Lucy Crompton-Reid wrote:
Thanks for all your comments and input into this. I can understand why those working closely within the open knowledge sector might feel there isn't a need for information about why this matters, but the audience we're aiming this at are people working in smaller organisations and societies, or simply interested members of the public, who need an introduction to open.
Was that an suggestion to widen the remit? "Open standards" are a part of "open", for example. And HTTP is "open"....
Gordo
Not really Gordo! Sorry if I wasn't clear. As Sara has offered to write the text, I'll discuss the brief in more detail with her - although happy for others to be involved, of course :)
On 26 February 2016 at 10:55, Gordon Joly gordon.joly@pobox.com wrote:
On 26/02/16 10:14, Lucy Crompton-Reid wrote:
Thanks for all your comments and input into this. I can understand why those working closely within the open knowledge sector might feel there isn't a need for information about why this matters, but the audience we're aiming this at are people working in smaller organisations and societies, or simply interested members of the public, who need an introduction to open.
Was that an suggestion to widen the remit? "Open standards" are a part of "open", for example. And HTTP is "open"....
Gordo
Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk
On 26/02/16 10:59, Lucy Crompton-Reid wrote:
Not really Gordo! Sorry if I wasn't clear. As Sara has offered to write the text, I'll discuss the brief in more detail with her - although happy for others to be involved, of course :)
That's fine. I assumed you were limiting to "open knowledge".
Gordo
On 26 February 2016 at 09:50 Fæ <faewik@gmail.com> wrote:
<snip>
I would make the flyer generic, it can then be used by other English speaking organizations and shared on the Outreach wiki rather than hidden away on the chapter wiki and appearing like proprietary marketing.
Could be. Horses for courses versus generic needs the context of an overall comms view, and I imagine the CE is working on this area.
I would like to row back slightly on what I said before, in that donations of data, not only or just media files, are becoming more relevant. I was at an event last night where this was on the agenda. These data "accessions" speak very directly to the concept of open knowledge; and "how" rather than "whether" is actually the likely stumbling point there.
Charles
On 25/02/16 17:31, Edward Saperia wrote:
At the risk of sounding negative, I also don't think this seems like a very productive thing for the charity to spend time on. Lots of materials already exist that explain the benefits of open knowledge - and without a clear audience or channel in mind, creating more media seems a bit pointless.
Just been made aware of this: http://openglam.org/
and
http://openglam.org/2016/02/24/think-big-start-small-move-fast/
"How the York Museums Trust started opening up its collection – OpenGLAM Case study"
Gordo
Hi all,
Maybe the en:Wikipedia page on open knowledge https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_knowledge could also be improved?
all the best
Fabian aka Leutha
On 23 February 2016 at 12:27 Lucy Crompton-Reid lucy.crompton-reid@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
Hi all
WMUK would like to provide better materials aimed at the general public which explain the benefits of open knowledge. I have already been signposted to some existing resources (provided by other organisations) but if you know of any really good materials on this, please let me know.
Also, if anyone would like to take on the task of writing a short, simple guide to open knowledge from a Wikimedia perspective, please let me know! This will go on our website but will also be a document that we can email to people as necessary.
Thanks Lucy
--
Lucy Crompton-Reid
Chief Executive
Wikimedia UK
+44 (0) 207 065 0991
Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT.
Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents.
Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk
wikimediauk-l@lists.wikimedia.org