hi,
I've put this up on the Noticeboard as well -
No prefered stand. I think we're worrying too much about niceties here. Let's set
the rules as the number of collaborators increase and there are needs for such limits and
rules. Why not work on all the articles nominated? This is the first time that this has
been re-introduced. However, I have no problems whether we're collaborating on 2
articles or 5 articles.
Rules need be applied only when really needed. Are rules really needed here?
warm regards,
Pradeep
User:Prad2609
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 16:23:33 +0530
From: ashwin.baindur(a)gmail.com
To: wikimediaindia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikimediaindia-l] Required - articles for Collaboration of the Month Dec
2011
Thanks for the suggestion, Srikanth . Did that.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk%3ANoticeboard_for_…
Please give your views here,everyone rather than on email -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Noticeboard_for_India-related_t…
Warm regards,
Ashwin Baindur
------------------------------------------------------
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 4:13 PM, Srikanth Lakshmanan <srik.lak(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 15:59, Ashwin Baindur <ashwin.baindur(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Do we have consensus for reducing to two. Any objections or alternatives proposed?
I think WT:INB might be better place, just because it is more representative than this
list for asking any feedback IMO.
--
Regards
Srikanth.L
_______________________________________________
Wikimediaindia-l mailing list
Wikimediaindia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from the list / change mailing preferences visit
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l
_______________________________________________
Wikimediaindia-l mailing list
Wikimediaindia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from the list / change mailing preferences visit
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l