On Sunday 30 January 2011 11:56 AM, jayanta nath wrote:
Nos of edit is not criteria. The chapter created as
society so there
must be voting system. So not worry!!
Then what was the criteria?
On Sunday 30 January 2011 01:03 PM, Sudhanwa Jogalekar wrote:
Can you please put up your ideas and give some
examples so that people
here will get some more clarity.
As you mentioned, things are "fair but not enough" please put up your
ideas so that things will be "enough and more"
I feel I am keeping myself here without any bruises, even against
chapter members, challenging their credibility and ability. For me it is
good; but for a community it is bad. That explains a lot. :-( (BTW where
is president and some other members of chapter? are they members of this
I rmember I asked about chapter's future plans in one of the other
threads, but still no answer. Is there any basic ideas about future
activities? Where I can find them?
May I know, whether asking idea is the basic idea? :) (I dont think it
is bad, but a chapter need atleast basic line up. don't give MoA link,
I've seen it many times :D)
For eg, in commons many images originated from India are deleted or
waiting to get deleted, just because no source available saying it is in
PD. Chapter can initiate a project to find PD images from India. Any
member can find many such issues, if they are wiki-rooted.
I didn't said I am an 'idea'(l) man. I tried to say, lack of openness of
chapter, non-supportive character and credibility doubts of members of
chapter. (I got one more, I think.)
For now I said enough. I don't want to start this from very beginning
again. I hope "chapter" will take appropriate measures to erase any
doubts of users.