On Sunday 30 January 2011 11:56 AM, jayanta nath wrote:
Nos of edit is not criteria. The chapter created as society so there must be voting system. So not worry!!
Then what was the criteria?
On Sunday 30 January 2011 01:03 PM, Sudhanwa Jogalekar wrote:
Can you please put up your ideas and give some examples so that people here will get some more clarity.
As you mentioned, things are "fair but not enough" please put up your ideas so that things will be "enough and more"
I feel I am keeping myself here without any bruises, even against chapter members, challenging their credibility and ability. For me it is good; but for a community it is bad. That explains a lot. :-( (BTW where is president and some other members of chapter? are they members of this list?)
I rmember I asked about chapter's future plans in one of the other threads, but still no answer. Is there any basic ideas about future activities? Where I can find them? May I know, whether asking idea is the basic idea? :) (I dont think it is bad, but a chapter need atleast basic line up. don't give MoA link, I've seen it many times :D)
For eg, in commons many images originated from India are deleted or waiting to get deleted, just because no source available saying it is in PD. Chapter can initiate a project to find PD images from India. Any member can find many such issues, if they are wiki-rooted.
I didn't said I am an 'idea'(l) man. I tried to say, lack of openness of chapter, non-supportive character and credibility doubts of members of chapter. (I got one more, I think.)
For now I said enough. I don't want to start this from very beginning again. I hope "chapter" will take appropriate measures to erase any doubts of users.
Thank you.