Have you tried using the ISAPI module, or just the CGI executable for PHP?
Al.
-----Original Message----- From: Troy Thompson [mailto:tthompson+mediawiki@envisionware.com] Sent: Tuesday, 14 June 2005 3:10 a.m. To: FL; MediaWiki announcements and site admin list Subject: RE: [Mediawiki-l] Windows Apache & IIS vs Linux Apacheperformancedifferences
I just want to ensure I've not overlooked something in IIS or PHP which would improve the performance. Has anyone compared Windows/IIS vs Linux/Apache and found vast differences in MediaWiki performance?
-----Original Message----- From: Alistair Johnson [mailto:JohnsonA@rembrandt.co.nz]
Have you tried using the ISAPI module, or just the CGI executable for PHP?
Al.
-----Original Message----- From: Troy Thompson [mailto:tthompson+mediawiki@envisionware.com] I just want to ensure I've not overlooked something in IIS or PHP which would improve the performance. Has anyone compared Windows/IIS vs Linux/Apache and found vast differences in MediaWiki performance?
I'm using the ISAPI module. I've not used the CGI on this server.
----- Troy Thompson IT Manager, Envisionware, Inc tthompson@envisionware.com mailto:tthompson@envisionware.com 678-584-5911 x 212
Just to add my bit; I am using php as a CGI and I still get very high processor usage about 50%. My system is a little faster so the performance of ISAPI to CGI seems about the same.
Arthur
-----Original Message----- From: Alistair Johnson [mailto:JohnsonA@rembrandt.co.nz]
Have you tried using the ISAPI module, or just the CGI executable for PHP?
Al.
-----Original Message----- From: Troy Thompson [mailto:tthompson+mediawiki@envisionware.com] I just want to ensure I've not overlooked something in IIS or PHP which would improve the performance. Has anyone compared Windows/IIS vs Linux/Apache and found vast differences in MediaWiki performance?
I'm using the ISAPI module. I've not used the CGI on this server.
'a star solutions' disclaimer The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any use, review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, reproduction or any action taken in reliance upon this message is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of the company. We believe that this communication is free from viruses and other potentially dangerous programmes, but the recipient opens this communication at their own risk. We assume no responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the receipt or use of this communication
I really don't care about performance on IIS or Win32, but if you do you should:
* Try a dummy PHP script as well as MediaWiki itself * Use MediaWiki's built-in profiling to see if the slowdown is isolated * Compare with/without eAccelerator or Turck MMCache (note that Zend Optimizer is *not* comparable to these; it's a different product which is primary a loader for precompiled/obfuscated scripts created with another Zend product and secondarily does some peephole optimizations in the compiled code, which apparently make very little performance difference in practice) * Try disabling $wgEnableSorbs, sometimes reported to help with very long delays on intranets with broken DNS
-- brion vibber (brion @ pobox.com)
mediawiki-l@lists.wikimedia.org