This is a stupid nit-picky thing, but w/r/t version numbers: it might just be worthwhile to use the microversion number for the release candidates.
Most folks wait a while with "dot zero" software anyways. So maybe just call the next version 1.2.4, and leave it at that.
Also, it might be worthwhile to start tagging the CVS repository for releases.
~ESP
On Mar 10, 2004, at 16:37, Evan Prodromou wrote:
This is a stupid nit-picky thing, but w/r/t version numbers: it might just be worthwhile to use the microversion number for the release candidates.
Most folks wait a while with "dot zero" software anyways. So maybe just call the next version 1.2.4, and leave it at that.
There's still some ugly bugs in the installer. (Had I not added that at the last minute, I'd have released 1.2.0 final instead of rc2.) I may skip rc4 and go straight to 1.2.0 though.
Also, it might be worthwhile to start tagging the CVS repository for releases.
You mean like the REL1_1_0, REL1_2rc1, REL1_2rc2, and REL1_2rc3 tags? :)
-- brion vibber (brion @ pobox.com)
"BV" == Brion Vibber brion@pobox.com writes:
BV> You mean like the REL1_1_0, REL1_2rc1, REL1_2rc2, and BV> REL1_2rc3 tags? :)
Are they there? Excellent!
~ESP
mediawiki-l@lists.wikimedia.org