From: Iv Ray <pobox(a)verysmall.org>
Jan Steinman schrieb:
Good designs for anarchy and consensus tend to
make poor designs for hierarchy and control.
... thanks God, there are people in MediaWiki, who think about good
design...
I see you missed my point completely.
My objection was strictly to your categorization of "good design" as
"designed the way I think it should be done." Design serves a purpose.
It does not necessarily serve *your* purpose. In fact, a good design
for one purpose may well be a completely poor design for another
purpose. That's why hammers aren't used for driving screws.
:::: When you change the way you look at things, the things you look
at change. -- Wayne Dyer.
:::: Jan Steinman <http://www.Bytesmiths.com/Item/99AO08-18>