Thank you. Since I am a bit skeptical concerning Google analytics, I have turned to PIWIK,
which seem to work quite similar as OWA. Any reason, why OWA might be preferable?
B.
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: mediawiki-l-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org
[mailto:mediawiki-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] Im Auftrag von Peter Adams
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 29. September 2010 09:32
An: MediaWiki announcements and site admin list
Betreff: Re: [Mediawiki-l] statistics, counter
Try Open Web Analytics.
It comes with a built in extension for tracking users of your mediawiki. metrics include
page views, visits, article creation/edit/deletion and a whole lot more.
http://www.openwebanalytics.com
-P-
--
Peter Adams <peter(a)openwebanalytics.com>
Open Web Analytics
http://www.openwebanalytics.com/
On Sep 19, 2010, at 4:06 PM, Scheid, Bernhard wrote:
I am searching for an extension that shows the
developments of hits on my wiki comparable to, for instance, [
statcounter.com]. User came
from, search queries, etc, would also be good to know. So far, I only found
Extension:Usage Statistics, which produces strange output on my Wiki and is moreover
unpleasant to handle. Any suggestions?
Thx
Bernhard
PS: For the moment I have installed
statcounter.com, which requires some loading time,
however, since it is loading an external JS file. There should be a more elegant solution
since the data are there, aren't they?
_______________________________________________
MediaWiki-l mailing list
MediaWiki-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
_______________________________________________
MediaWiki-l mailing list
MediaWiki-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l