Hello,
as I know there are several seo extensions available but which one seems to be the more effective as also the most easy to handle one?
I found these:
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Add_HTML_Meta_and_Title http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Advanced_Meta http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Add_Metas
And I am sure there are some further more.
So here is my question: Which one do you use?
Take care uv
Hi, this is a good question. There is no answers by now?
dvd.
El dl 21 de 03 de 2011 a les 01:16 +0100, en/na uv22e Alcott va escriure:
Hello,
as I know there are several seo extensions available but which one seems to be the more effective as also the most easy to handle one?
I found these:
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Add_HTML_Meta_and_Title http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Advanced_Meta http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Add_Metas
And I am sure there are some further more.
So here is my question: Which one do you use?
Take care uv _______________________________________________ MediaWiki-l mailing list MediaWiki-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
Hello all, I had asked a similar question but I don't see it at all in the archives. So, In terms of SEO, is there also a good Sitemap tool? I'd like a sitemap that I could submit to Google and the other search engines. The other extension I was using was limited to a certain # of links and it didn't seem the most reliable. Bruce
-----Original Message----- From: david Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2011 6:06 PM To: MediaWiki announcements and site admin list Subject: Re: [Mediawiki-l] which Seo extension do you use?
Hi, this is a good question. There is no answers by now?
dvd.
El dl 21 de 03 de 2011 a les 01:16 +0100, en/na uv22e Alcott va escriure:
Hello,
as I know there are several seo extensions available but which one seems to be the more effective as also the most easy to handle one?
I found these:
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Add_HTML_Meta_and_Title http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Advanced_Meta http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Add_Metas
And I am sure there are some further more.
So here is my question: Which one do you use?
Take care uv _______________________________________________ MediaWiki-l mailing list MediaWiki-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
_______________________________________________ MediaWiki-l mailing list MediaWiki-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
On 21/03/11 01:16, uv22e Alcott wrote:
Hello,
as I know there are several seo extensions available but which one seems to be the more effective as also the most easy to handle one?
I found these:
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Add_HTML_Meta_and_Title http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Advanced_Meta http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Add_Metas
And I am sure there are some further more.
I don't think meta keywords are relevant for SEO anymore.
So here is my question: Which one do you use?
Wikipedia doesn't use any of them.
El dj 17 de 11 de 2011 a les 00:52 +0100, en/na Platonides va escriure:
On 21/03/11 01:16, uv22e Alcott wrote:
Hello,
as I know there are several seo extensions available but which one seems to be the more effective as also the most easy to handle one?
I found these:
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Add_HTML_Meta_and_Title http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Advanced_Meta http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Add_Metas
And I am sure there are some further more.
I don't think meta keywords are relevant for SEO anymore.
But "description" or "title" are useful to show info about the site in searchengine results and other places; and the browsers use this metadata, isn't it?
So here is my question: Which one do you use?
Wikipedia doesn't use any of them.
MediaWiki-l mailing list MediaWiki-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 9:22 AM, david dvd@enlloc.org wrote:
El dj 17 de 11 de 2011 a les 00:52 +0100, en/na Platonides va escriure:
On 21/03/11 01:16, uv22e Alcott wrote:
Hello,
as I know there are several seo extensions available but which one
seems to
be the more effective as also the most easy to handle one?
I found these:
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Add_HTML_Meta_and_Title http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Advanced_Meta http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Add_Metas
And I am sure there are some further more.
I don't think meta keywords are relevant for SEO anymore.
But "description" or "title" are useful to show info about the site in searchengine results and other places; and the browsers use this metadata, isn't it?
So here is my question: Which one do you use?
Wikipedia doesn't use any of them.
As far as I know browser don't and never did anything with meta-data, it was meant for search engines.
However search engines are smart enough to extract the title, keywords and description themselves. And many other things as well.
For example:
https://www.google.com/search?q=Steve+Jobs
- Google extracts the title, the summary (first paragraph of article), and section / related article links. And that's just what we see publically.
Being SEO friendly doesn't require installing a plugin by definition, some web applications are actually good at it out of the box. I think MediaWiki is one of them :)
-- Krinkle
Being SEO friendly doesn't require installing a plugin by definition, some web applications are actually good at it out of the box. I think MediaWiki is one of them :)
I am not sure if i can confirm this. I did post a short text into a Wordpress installation with a SEO Tool and landed on No.1 on Google
The same Text with same header, I did write into a Mediawiki installation and its not listes on the 1st 10 pages in google.
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 03:38:57 -0800, Isabell Alcott uv22ealcott@googlemail.com wrote:
Being SEO friendly doesn't require installing a plugin by definition, some web applications are actually good at it out of the box. I think MediaWiki is one of them :)
I am not sure if i can confirm this. I did post a short text into a Wordpress installation with a SEO Tool and landed on No.1 on Google
The same Text with same header, I did write into a Mediawiki installation and its not listes on the 1st 10 pages in google.
- Did Google even get to indexing the content - Did Google perhaps notice the fact you used the same content in multiple places and then decide to not show the second url because it's duplicate content - etc...
Search engines are mystical black boxes only understood by the gremlins (*cough*Google developers*cough*) that live inside them. You can't make a simple test like that and say that something is more optimized for search engines than another.
mediawiki-l@lists.wikimedia.org