I'm not clear on this -- If we want to test the update, should we still use the snapshot linked by Brion, or should we used the fixed SVN head revision? And if so, how do we get that revision as a tarball?
-Jeff
-----Original Message----- From: mediawiki-l-bounces@Wikimedia.org [mailto:mediawiki-l-bounces@Wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Rob Church Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 8:03 AM To: MediaWiki announcements and site admin list Subject: Re: [Mediawiki-l] Test snapshot for MediaWiki 1.6.0
On 04/04/06, Thomas Klein tkl-online@gmx.de wrote:
The file "patch-ss_images.sql" is wrong.
The wrong file: ALTER TABLE /*$wgDBprefix*/site_stats ADD ss_images int(10) default
'0';
SELECT @images := COUNT(*) FROM /*$wgDBprefix*/image; UPDATE site_stats SET ss_images=@images;
The is correct: ALTER TABLE /*$wgDBprefix*/site_stats ADD ss_images int(10) default
'0';
SELECT @images := COUNT(*) FROM /*$wgDBprefix*/image; UPDATE /*$wgDBprefix*/site_stats SET ss_images=@images;
Fixed in SVN HEAD.
Rob Church _______________________________________________ MediaWiki-l mailing list MediaWiki-l@Wikimedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
Jeff Lane wrote:
I'm not clear on this -- If we want to test the update, should we still use the snapshot linked by Brion, or should we used the fixed SVN head revision? And if so, how do we get that revision as a tarball?
I've updated the snapshot: http://svn.wikimedia.org/snapshots/mediawiki-snapshot-20060404.tar.gz
If you have a Subversion client installed, you can also pull the source directly from the repository. Unlike the old CVS system, anonymous access is fully up to date.
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Download_from_SVN
-- brion vibber (brion @ pobox.com)
mediawiki-l@lists.wikimedia.org