(to list as well)

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com Date: 10 February 2011 16:58 Subject: Re: [Mediawiki-l] Least-worst present WYSIWYG solution? To: "Haim (Howard) Roman" roman@jct.ac.il

On 10 February 2011 16:46, Haim (Howard) Roman roman@jct.ac.il wrote:

What do you mean by "good"?  A full-fledged office suite, e.g. Open or MS? Auto-completion when typing in names of articles in your wiki, or templates?

Just the editing window itself, so they never need to see wikitext.

As far as I can tell, Media Wiki was designed for relatively simple formatting.  I admit I write in wiki-text, though I now tend to switch to FCKeditor (Version 1.0.1) to edit tables.  It does a pretty good job, and allows you to go back & forth between wiki text & "rich editor" modes.

I shall give that a non-techie testing then!

- d.