-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Hi there,
at the end of
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hilfe:Listen
you can find an example for an ordered list interspersed with a simple text line and with a new new starting number.
Wiki-text is
.............................. # eins # zwei Zwischenüberschrift od. Leerzeile #<li value="3"> drei</li> # vier ..............................
and will/should lead to
.............................. ~ 1. eins ~ 2. zwei
Zwischenüberschrift od. Leerzeile
~ 3. drei ~ 4. vier ..............................
In our old MS 1.9.3 we got instead:
.............................. ~ 1. eins ~ 2. zwei
Zwischenüberschrift od. Leerzeile
~ 1. ~ 3. drei ~ 4. vier ..............................
So we have decided to test it in a fresh installed and empty MW 1.12.0 - - with the same result!!
In de.wikipedia.org (1.13.alpha) it works fine.
So my question: What's wrong?
What I saw in HTML souce code was:
<ol> <li> eins</li> <li> zwei</li> </ol> <p>Zwischenüberschrift od. Leerzeile</p> <ol> <li> <li value="3"> drei</li> </li> <li> vier</li> </ol>
So why the second ordered list comes with a double <li> tag where 1.13.Alpha (de.wikipedia.org) shows correct:
<ol> <li>eins</li> <li>zwei</li> </ol> <p>Zwischenüberschrift od. Leerzeile</p> <ol> <li value="3">drei</li> <li>vier</li> </ol>
Uwe (Baumbach) U.Baumbach@web.de
Uwe Baumbach wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Hi there,
at the end of
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hilfe:Listen
you can find an example for an ordered list interspersed with a simple text line and with a new new starting number.
Wiki-text is
.............................. # eins # zwei Zwischenüberschrift od. Leerzeile #<li value="3"> drei</li> # vier ..............................
and will/should lead to
.............................. ~ 1. eins ~ 2. zwei
Zwischenüberschrift od. Leerzeile
~ 3. drei ~ 4. vier ..............................
No it shouldn't.
[...]
So why the second ordered list comes with a double <li> tag where 1.13.Alpha (de.wikipedia.org) shows correct:
Because on de.wikipedia.org, Tidy is cleaning up MediaWiki's incorrect HTML output in such a way that it appears that MediaWiki has this feature. MediaWiki does not have this feature, and if it did, the syntax would be different.
The fact that MediaWiki is producing invalid HTML is a bug. When the bug is fixed, this apparent feature will disappear.
-- Tim Starling
mediawiki-l@lists.wikimedia.org