On 26 November 2012 17:18, Mark A. Hershberger <mah(a)everybody.org> wrote:
On 11/26/2012 12:14 PM, Quim Gil wrote:
> That wouldn't be the solution of the tarball
problem you are describing
> but it would be really useful for the majority of MW admins having to
> search for extensions *after* they miss something.
Actually, any extensions that are widely used like
that *should* be
considered for inclusion in the tarball.
Something analogous to popcon for extensions?
- d.