2009/5/7 Chris Reigrut <chris(a)reigrut.net>et>:
David Garard wrote:
> I'm still looking forward to corporate
readiness of MediaWiki, which
> for us basically means (1) good WYSIWYG (2) good search. (2) means
> Lucene in a box. We hardly care what box.
> (The competitor is Confluence. Which is highly usable and an UTTER
> BASTARD to administer. Though Atlassian are very good at support.)
This actually came from the Key Equipment Finance
wiki. We've found it
to be pretty good, but not perfect, in a corporate environment. This
addressed point #2, and we've used FCKEditor with pretty good success
for #1. Many folks would argue there's a #3 (fine-grained security),
but I've managed to hold them off on that front thus far.
Yeah. "Fine-grained security" and "wiki" really don't go together.
But
try convincing people of that.
- d.