--- Ricardo Rodríguez Your XEN ICT Team

...

...

PlatonidesPlatonides@gmail.com 24/03/07 8:23 >>>

This is done to make the second user aware of the changes, so he can merge both.

Thanks. It is now clear to me. And this is the problem at the same time: it is clear to me but it I am not sure I will be able to convince team members to expend time understanding it.

Then the second one would simply "won" without noticing.

One solution could be stating that before editing very-used articles they had to do a microedit adding a template

{{i'm editing this|~~~~}} and then do the full edit (removing the template on it) so if a user wants to edit an article and it has the template, he should wait (if the template was added recently, of course). Another way could be doing one edit per section. Edits on different sections merge gracefully, and an edit conflict on a section will be small.

Saludos

The template works great. But, could you figure out how to automatically introduce it at the top of the document/section to be edited when you hit the edit button and automatically remove it when hitting the Save one?

This will avoid to relly on the user action to copy/paste/remove the template to warn other users she/he is editing the concerning section.

Could it be a feature request?

Saludos!