On 16/10/2007, Eric K ek79501@yahoo.com wrote:
I think making an IP do a captcha on its first edit only would help. The captcha would keep a record of the most recent IP's in a table and if an edit hasnt been recorded from them, give them a captcha, otherwise pass. This may mean the IP table would grow large (may not be fast for large wikis with lots of editing), but purge it a certain period (15 days etc). Captcha has to be there one way or the other. This is least irritating.
I like the idea.
There is definitely no way to check if an edit is spam or not, except for capthcha.
Not currently. I think a 'review for spam' feature would work very well for most small sites.
Dan Bolser dan.bolser@gmail.com wrote: On 16/10/2007, Chuck wrote:
Has anybody found a solution for the gibberish spam short of installing captcha extensions?
Not here. I set anonymous edits to false and installed reCaptcha.
Installing reCaptcha doesn't really constitute a big change to the wiki (its quite unobtrusive really), but disallowing anonymous edits is a pain. This is especially true of pre 1.11.0 MW versions where 'view source' doesn't seem to work 'out of the box'.
In theory there should be a simple SQL query to detect these kinds of spam (one nonsense word at the start of a page) - However, it seems better to code a general solution that highlights potential spam for review. Its keeping track of the potentially spammed pages that I find most difficult.
Anyone handy with Bayesian filters? If we could rank edits by 'spaminess' using a Bayesian filter, and be given the option to review the top n most spammy revisions (with feedback training) ... well... that would be great!
Send all your edits to a gmail account and only allow those that get forwarded back?
Chuck
2007@gmask.com wrote:
Yea I don't want to stop anonymous users but it seems like that might be neccessary.. or it would be great if you could captcha new posts from either new users or unfamiliar IP's.
-Adrian
--- Chuck wrote:
Benjamin Horst wrote:
I was experiencing the same types of "spam," or whatever it is.
I started to enforce a captcha on every edit, which bothers me, but
stopped the junk. I hope there's a better solution out there!
Thanks, Ben
We're having the same problem with our wikis. It seems that this could be solved if thereis a switch in MediaWiki that really mandates that changes be made by registered users.
We are planning to implement the other spam measures mentioned on this list.
Thanks to the advice from last week about how to stop DIV spam.
Chuck
MediaWiki-l mailing list MediaWiki-l@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
MediaWiki-l mailing list MediaWiki-l@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
--
Bread and Roses Web Design serving small businesses, non-profits, artists and activists http://www.breadandrosesweb.com/
MediaWiki-l mailing list MediaWiki-l@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
-- hello
MediaWiki-l mailing list MediaWiki-l@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
Don't let your dream ride pass you by. Make it a reality with Yahoo! Autos. _______________________________________________ MediaWiki-l mailing list MediaWiki-l@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l