A philosophical thought:
The Wiki paradigm encourages a flatter, organic, web-oriented structure, with pages cross-referencing each other, as opposed to rigid hierarachical. (I can't think of a better word then "web", but I don't mean WWW, although WWW was meant to be web-oriented when Tom Bernes-Lee envisaged it.)
I second Anders' advice: Start early and improve the organisation on the go.
skill2die4@secguru.com wrote:
Wiki is very different from the rest of the web technologies, and impressive too ;-)
I am currently looking at the possiblity of using wiki for my upcoming site, which would be like online documentation. However, i am going crazy over the design stuff ... eg.. should i make this category or a section , this and that...
So, my questions to peers who are already using wiki is that how difficult it is to change the orientation of your site once you get started. What is the general practise : start small and keep changing stuff , or make a well designed skeleton and then add to it.
just a n00b, who is confused with all the wiki options :-p
Thanks in Advance,
-=skillz=- _______________________________________________ MediaWiki-l mailing list MediaWiki-l@Wikimedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l