Yeah, that's the sense I'm getting too. Too bad, really, cuz it's without a doubt the most polished of all the wikis I've looked at (and I've looked at LOTS). Cheers. Fil
On 4 June 2010 18:10, OQ overlordq@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Filippo A. Salustri salustri@ryerson.ca wrote:
Thanks. I'll take it under advisement. Simply put, I'd prefer to have certain collections of pages that I can control both the visibility and the editability. Cheers. Fil
Then I'd suggest not mediawiki. While extensions may or may not be secure, mediawiki in itself was not designed for fine grained access control so there are no guarantees that your data will be secure, or that the functionality wont be broken in subsequent releases.
MediaWiki-l mailing list MediaWiki-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l