So this is not an issue after all? No? Cheers Karsten
Am 21.06.2018 um 10:24 schrieb [[kgh]]:
Thanks a lot for sharing your solution to the problem. However, this sounds like a bug to me that should be fixed.
I however do not know how you ended up with 0 instead of NULL and if this could also have happened to other users of MW using the special page in the past to change the content model.
I understand that some developers are on this list too who can easily at least assess if there is an issue. Let's wait for their reply.
Cheers Karsten
Am 21.06.2018 um 02:19 schrieb David Bohman:
I got past the problem. It appears that MW 1.31 is not as permissive about the value of rev_content_model in the revision table. I had entries in the table which were 0, and MW 1.30 did not have a problem with it. However, 1.31 only accepts a value of NULL, otherwise it barfs.
Anyhow, I fixed it by forcing the 0 values in the revision table to their default value. The logic seems to be to be to use the content model from the revision if it is set to non-null, otherwise use the value in the page table. I suspect that earlier versions of MW accepted a revision content model of 0 as the same as NULL.
David Bohman _______________________________________________ MediaWiki-l mailing list To unsubscribe, go to: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
MediaWiki-l mailing list To unsubscribe, go to: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l