As for the flower, when I look at the new you propose and the old, the old to me looks much more natural - the new looks too synthesised.
The whole point of the brackets is surely that they ARE square and ordinary. If you start making them round, it loses all the not-so-subtle symbolism. Not unless in MediaWiki 2.0 links are expressed as ((mylink))?
Hugh
"Erik Moeller" eloquence@gmail.com wrote in message news:b80736c80606160107y1a2ae350s317940a0e5558b5b@mail.gmail.com...
As MediaWiki 2.0 is slowly moving closer, I think we should consider replacing the current logo. The problems I have with it (and I say that as its co-designer) are that the colors feel washed out, the flower is asymmetrical, and the square brackets look just a tad bit too square and ordinary.
Erik