On 26/05/11 08:31, Rick Payton wrote:
Ok good it's not me then. I just checked the archives, it would appear that Tim is ... broken :P
It's not me. One of them had these headers:
Received: from smtprelay01.ispgateway.de ([80.67.31.39]:53831) by lily.knams.wikimedia.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from tstarling@wikimedia.org) id 1QIHu3-0001SE-0h; Fri, 06 May 2011 10:04:55 +0000 Received: from [79.240.133.81] (helo=optacom.com) by smtprelay01.ispgateway.de with esmtpa (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from tstarling@wikimedia.org) id 1QIHu2-0004NH-DB; Fri, 06 May 2011 12:04:54 +0200 Received: from mail pickup service by optacom.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Fri, 6 May 2011 12:04:53 +0200 Received: by [server1.Optacom.local (Microsoft Connector for POP3 Mailboxes)] id <"{D3597636-EB0B-4059-9554-6975A2217D24}"@Optacom.local>; Thu, 5 May 2011 07:55:04 +0200
Another even had a different envelope sender:
From zimbra@mail.samara-aviagas.ru Tue May 24 17:18:29 2011
... Received: from lists.wikimedia.org (lists.wikimedia.org [91.198.174.5]) by mail.samara-aviagas.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id C282115A31 for dolaev-ir@samara-aviagas.ru; Thu, 5 May 2011 09:54:50 +0400 (MSD) ... From: Tim Starling tstarling@wikimedia.org
They use duplicate message IDs, which I suppose is why they didn't appear in Gmane. Maybe it's a test of a new spamming strategy. I've long said that Mailman is laughably insecure and that it's only a matter of time before it's spammed to death, and that the only solution will be to evacuate to a web forum.
-- Tim Starling