(to list as well)
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com Date: 10 February 2011 16:58 Subject: Re: [Mediawiki-l] Least-worst present WYSIWYG solution? To: "Haim (Howard) Roman" roman@jct.ac.il
On 10 February 2011 16:46, Haim (Howard) Roman roman@jct.ac.il wrote:
What do you mean by "good"? A full-fledged office suite, e.g. Open or MS? Auto-completion when typing in names of articles in your wiki, or templates?
Just the editing window itself, so they never need to see wikitext.
As far as I can tell, Media Wiki was designed for relatively simple formatting. I admit I write in wiki-text, though I now tend to switch to FCKeditor (Version 1.0.1) to edit tables. It does a pretty good job, and allows you to go back & forth between wiki text & "rich editor" modes.
I shall give that a non-techie testing then!
- d.